Re: [pcp] Posted auth req slide that was edited during meeting

Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> Wed, 27 March 2013 01:10 UTC

Return-Path: <dthaler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5462B21E8039 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ODRzC7N1fYlw for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0240.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.240]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BA221F85A2 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BY2FFO11FD004.protection.gbl (10.173.161.201) by BL2FFO11HUB002.protection.gbl (10.173.161.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.651.3; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:09:45 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BY2FFO11FD004.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.1.14.158) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.651.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:09:45 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC264.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.1.147]) by TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.7.153]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.003; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:09:24 +0000
From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>, "yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp" <yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp>
Thread-Topic: [pcp] Posted auth req slide that was edited during meeting
Thread-Index: AQHOKiGOZVo7fOcKTKW7xX5uXeSScpi4uthA
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:09:24 +0000
Message-ID: <44E744236D325141AE8DDC88A45908AD0BEE66@TK5EX14MBXC264.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <341064315C6D0D498193B256F238CF9747C9C9@TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <5EF8B214-6563-47C7-9D48-621D9D5E1B29@yegin.org> <tslip4r42r3.fsf@mit.edu> <674F70E5F2BE564CB06B6901FD3DD78B12CD0A01@tgxml337.toshiba.local> <tslk3p4zyze.fsf@mit.edu> <674F70E5F2BE564CB06B6901FD3DD78B12CDB0CB@tgxml337.toshiba.local> <tsl620ox0zb.fsf@mit.edu> <674F70E5F2BE564CB06B6901FD3DD78B12CDB148@tgxml337.toshiba.local> <674F70E5F2BE564CB06B6901FD3DD78B12CDEA18@tgxml337.toshiba.local> <tslvc8e52al.fsf@mit.edu> <tslip4e48td.fsf@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tslip4e48td.fsf@mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.20]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(51704002)(199002)(189002)(13464002)(377454001)(56776001)(49866001)(51856001)(65816001)(4396001)(74502001)(5343655001)(16406001)(50466001)(76482001)(31966008)(79102001)(59766001)(47446002)(23726001)(74662001)(46406002)(54316002)(46102001)(33656001)(77982001)(69226001)(66066001)(56816002)(20776003)(55846006)(47976001)(50986001)(47776003)(47736001)(53806001)(44976002)(54356001)(63696002)(80022001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB002; H:TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0798146F16
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Posted auth req slide that was edited during meeting
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:10:10 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pcp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pcp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Sam Hartman
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 5:58 AM
> To: yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp
> Cc: pcp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [pcp] Posted auth req slide that was edited during meeting
> 
> I'm sorry, but I think it's totally reasonable to mandate in a spec and enforce
> in servers that PCP clients cannot send messages using expired SAs.
[...]

(With no hats on) I agree with the above.   It's totally reasonable to mandate
such a thing, if that's what the WG decides to do.

-Dave