Re: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-09

<ian.farrer@telekom.de> Mon, 14 January 2013 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ian.farrer@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4A121F8844 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:54:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ajdXJ+I25QKn for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:54:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tcmail13.telekom.de (tcmail13.telekom.de [80.149.113.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE11E21F86D3 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:54:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from he113656.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.134.99.16]) by tcmail11.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 14 Jan 2013 17:54:02 +0100
Received: from HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM ([10.134.93.12]) by HE113656.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([::1]) with mapi; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:54:02 +0100
From: ian.farrer@telekom.de
To: pcp@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:54:01 +0100
Thread-Topic: Re: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-09
Thread-Index: Ac3yYi+clS7kaFvbTaGmNw5Xl4esVQ==
Message-ID: <8A1B81989BCFAE44A22B2B86BF2B763189618470ED@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8A1B81989BCFAE44A22B2B86BF2B763189618470EDHE111643EMEA1_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-09
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:54:18 -0000

I support adopting this draft.
It would be good like to see more other use cases (aside from lw4o6) in the next version.
Regards,
Ian
On 02/01/2013 6:34 PM, Reinaldo Penno (rpenno) wrote:
Hello,

This email starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting

     Title     : Using PCP To Coordinate Between the CGN and Home Gateway
     Author(s) : Q. Sun et al
     Filename  : draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-09.txt
     URL       : http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-09.txt

Please read the current revision and state you opinion either for or
against adoption (and with reasoning why) in the mailing list.

The call for adoption ends 16th January 2013.

Thanks,