IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-09

Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz@forthnetgroup.gr> Mon, 14 January 2013 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <achatz@forthnetgroup.gr>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E67A21F8550 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:13:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Lsfj2jFda4N for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:13:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.115]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A6C21F84E0 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:13:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx-av-06.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-01.forthnet.gr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0EHDIFr006600 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:13:18 +0200
Received: from MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr (mx-in-04.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.163]) by mx-av-06.forthnet.gr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0EHDIsj014170 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:13:18 +0200
Received: from [62.1.48.75] (achatz.forthnet.gr [62.1.48.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0EHDHgc000472; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:13:17 +0200
Authentication-Results: MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=achatz@forthnetgroup.gr; auth=pass (PLAIN)
Message-ID: <50F43CAB.7000206@forthnetgroup.gr>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:13:15 +0200
From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz@forthnetgroup.gr>
Organization: Forthnet
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
References: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F06041E9D48@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F06041E9D48@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-09
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:13:21 -0000

I support this draft, but i would like to see more cases covered (and some parts are not very clearly written).

Also, as i already have informed the pcp authors about the base spec, i was hoping to see a solution for non-continuous
port assignments in a single request.
Any plans for that?

Thanks,
Tassos

Reinaldo Penno (repenno) wrote on 03/01/2013 01:34:
> Hello,
>
> This email starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting
>
>      Title     : Using PCP To Coordinate Between the CGN and Home Gateway
>      Author(s) : Q. Sun et al
>      Filename  : draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-09.txt
>      URL       : http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-09.txt
>
> Please read the current revision and state you opinion either for or
> against adoption (and with reasoning why) in the mailing list.
>
> The call for adoption ends 16th January 2013.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pcp mailing list
> pcp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email