IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: The Port Control Protocol in Dual-Stack Lite environments

Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz@forthnetgroup.gr> Wed, 15 May 2013 11:09 UTC

Return-Path: <achatz@forthnetgroup.gr>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B061521F84CD for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 04:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HLfPsnZcDXwN for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 04:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.115]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42FE21F84B2 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2013 04:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx-av-03.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-06.forthnet.gr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4FB9MuV032234; Wed, 15 May 2013 14:09:22 +0300
Received: from MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr (mx-in-01.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.23]) by mx-av-03.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r4FB9LxU013410; Wed, 15 May 2013 14:09:21 +0300
Received: from [62.1.48.75] (achatz.forthnet.gr [62.1.48.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4FB9KaU019453; Wed, 15 May 2013 14:09:21 +0300
Authentication-Results: MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=achatz@forthnetgroup.gr; auth=pass (PLAIN)
Message-ID: <51936CDE.6000001@forthnetgroup.gr>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 14:09:18 +0300
From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz@forthnetgroup.gr>
Organization: Forthnet
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0 SeaMonkey/2.16.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com>, "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
References: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F06040907F7AA@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F06040907F7AA@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: The Port Control Protocol in Dual-Stack Lite environments
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 11:09:44 -0000

Support, although it's not very clear to me why PCP proxy is the only option examined/described.
Do we assume that all applications and end systems will support PCP?
Can't B4 be just a PCP client, taking instructions for mappings through cli or gui?

--
Tassos

Reinaldo Penno (repenno) wrote on 10/05/2013 14:03:
> Hello,
>
> This email starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting
>
>      Title     : The Port Control Protocol in Dual-Stack Lite environments
>      Author(s) : F. Dupont t al.
>      URL       : http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dupont-pcp-dslite-05
>
> Please read the current revision and state you opinion either for or
> against adoption (and with reasoning why) in the mailing list.
>
> The call for adoption ends 24th May 2013.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Reinaldo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pcp mailing list
> pcp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email