IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-09

Alain Durand <adurand@juniper.net> Mon, 14 January 2013 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <adurand@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962BC21F88E2 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:31:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.467
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87KQ37esvadS for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:31:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og110.obsmtp.com (exprod7og110.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094F521F88D6 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:31:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob110.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUPRPCALT7GKa121SFM9qFdhnV0EyJ8fD@postini.com; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:31:37 PST
Received: from P-CLDFE01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.59) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:30:17 -0800
Received: from o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.224) by o365mail.juniper.net (172.24.192.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.355.2; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:30:17 -0800
Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (216.32.181.185) by o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.224) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:38:23 -0800
Received: from mail109-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.245) by CH1EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (10.43.70.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:30:15 +0000
Received: from mail109-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail109-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1DF3603BB for <pcp@ietf.org.FOPE.CONNECTOR.OVERRIDE>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:30:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.101; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BL2PRD0510HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT
X-SpamScore: -4
X-BigFish: PS-4(zz98dI9371Ic89bh936eI1432Izz1ee6h1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzzz2dh2a8h668h839h947hd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h1155h)
Received: from mail109-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail109-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1358188214150497_11158; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:30:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1EHSMHS017.bigfish.com (snatpool1.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.250]) by mail109-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223CC20067; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:30:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0510HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.101) by CH1EHSMHS017.bigfish.com (10.43.70.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:30:13 +0000
Received: from BL2PRD0510MB386.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.11.99]) by BL2PRD0510HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.100.38]) with mapi id 14.16.0257.004; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:30:12 +0000
From: Alain Durand <adurand@juniper.net>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Thread-Topic: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-09
Thread-Index: AQHN6UG/IWNhS315/EentG942BWJKpg207WAgAIc+oCAARA1gIADo9OAgAB4CICAAuqrgIAAJ6yAgAABGwCACAergA==
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:30:11 +0000
Message-ID: <82256834F867D44BBB8E49E40D5448BB065B0451@BL2PRD0510MB386.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F06041E9D32@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F06041E9D48@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <01ab01cde953$1cbfed70$563fc850$@cisco.com> <CAH3bfAD+xumMtSWAm8bc_C-0FUBJZ_YXDJHwN9Xw0MNBnon=6w@mail.gmail.com> <037201cdeae9$b4109e80$1c31db80$@cisco.com> <50EA9909.4040401@viagenie.ca> <023501cdecf7$a19b9e20$e4d2da60$@cisco.com> <CAH3bfACunK1f0xad6FqvkNT8huRk8FU7U0J9SwrSmG82jLDvRg@mail.gmail.com> <0b8101cdee80$cd8962d0$689c2870$@cisco.com> <50ED9248.8000306@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <50ED9248.8000306@viagenie.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.255.100.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <ABDB0AF283C5464896EE258708127D0D@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%VIAGENIE.CA$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%CISCO.COM$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
Cc: "<pcp@ietf.org>" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-09
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:31:37 -0000

On Jan 9, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:

> Le 2013-01-09 16:48, Dan Wing a écrit :
>> I would really like to see the need for both PCP and DHCP before either
>> working group adopts a mechanism.  If we don't do that now, the
>> same question is likely to arise when during IETF last call or during
>> IESG review.
> 
> Even if the DHCP mechanism would get chosen for LW4o6, I would argue that MAP_PORT_SET still has merit on its own, for the non-LW4o6 purposes we have described.

I would like to see those merits being fully articulated before the wg adopt this draft.

    - Alain.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email