[Pearg] Brian Trammell's Yes on draft-irtf-pearg-numeric-ids-history-09: (with COMMENT)

[Brian Trammell via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Brian Trammell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-irtf-pearg-numeric-ids-history-09: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-pearg-numeric-ids-history/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This document is ready for publication on the IRTF stream.

Two questions, though (my Yes here does not depend on the answers):

(1) I notice that most of the chronologies seem to shift from academic
citations to I-Ds and don't shift back; did academia lose interest in these
issues at that time, or did the literature search only cover the time before
the discussion moved to various IETF working groups?

(2) The document has a significant number of informative references to
abandoned I-Ds. Were these submitted for adoption by the associated WGs (i.e.,
it'd be interesting to know if the WG process failed to address mitigations for
these identification issues), or merely intended as points of discussion?