IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pearg] Brian Trammell's Yes on draft-irtf-pearg-numeric-ids-history-09: (with COMMENT)

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Tue, 12 July 2022 00:35 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34BAC16ECBE; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZZtJJgrcxdti; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A9DC14792F; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:67c:27e4:c::1001] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4:c::1001]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3209280244; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 00:35:26 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <d27b5e39-9290-100e-3471-6dff6c30a5cc@si6networks.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 21:35:24 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Brian Trammell <trammell@google.com>, The IRSG <irsg@irtf.org>
Cc: draft-irtf-pearg-numeric-ids-history@ietf.org, pearg-chairs@ietf.org, pearg@irtf.org, sara@sinodun.com
References: <165538883599.60682.16650863205769317634@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
In-Reply-To: <165538883599.60682.16650863205769317634@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pearg/um_NJwVejGReDaqgdHQ2Y4E6Pfc>
Subject: Re: [Pearg] Brian Trammell's Yes on draft-irtf-pearg-numeric-ids-history-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pearg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhancements and Assessment Proposed RG <pearg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pearg/>
List-Post: <mailto:pearg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 00:35:37 -0000

Hi, Brian,

On 16/6/22 11:13, Brian Trammell via Datatracker wrote:
[...]
> 
> (2) The document has a significant number of informative references to
> abandoned I-Ds. Were these submitted for adoption by the associated WGs (i.e.,
> it'd be interesting to know if the WG process failed to address mitigations for
> these identification issues), or merely intended as points of discussion?

FWIW, in addition to the changes we have applied to the I-Ds, we hace 
reported support@ietf.org updated metadata such that it's easier to spot 
I-D that have been replaced by others rather than abandoned -- I did 
this for about 10 I-Ds are so.

Thanks!

Regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email