[Pearg] IPv6 vs. IPv4 in anti-abuse ("Anti-fraud and abuse" by Theodorakis, Pfeiffenberger and Turner)

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Tue, 19 January 2021 21:30 UTC

To: "pearg@irtf.org" <pearg@irtf.org>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <d965bbc6-9a8c-b807-75ac-22090fc196ac@si6networks.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:44:48 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pearg/Yl18b9F7gnt_EaKxOJythX92rvc>
Subject: [Pearg] IPv6 vs. IPv4 in anti-abuse ("Anti-fraud and abuse" by Theodorakis, Pfeiffenberger and Turner)
Precedence: list

Folks,

Just bringing this question to the mailing-list as we ran out of time 
for more discussion:

How anti-abuse changes (if it does) when talking about IPv6?

You can certainly assume a user has been assigned a /64, but the user 
could also get anything ranging from /48 to /64... and I'm told some VPS 
providers give their "users" a single IPv6 address (/128).

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

[Pearg] IPv6 vs. IPv4 in anti-abuse ("Anti-fraud … Fernando Gont