IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Perc] PERC LIte

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Wed, 24 May 2017 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C5C126CF6 for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X3zaGzPyN7OU for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x231.google.com (mail-vk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 125E31200E5 for <perc@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id x71so79554790vkd.0 for <perc@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0AFAgbkgcGIEtvXRGwbGiYKNO0H5y3an4GOotoKqUVA=; b=pqHe9SdlCIT7oYGyChM3Kv5cdRSPSlR271UsWOqfNEMOLk5Ipe704QJRHS5M6enT0N M/BBnNwXWp1aHutIilcTT4vyw/Z18AATJnCuuFqSkzcvovODYNXexuBD5NARSI49sHS2 bXJ/naYQqukdBjxGUTYgmp5x3voFK6ykzYIUKU2L0qNJ4KEUvmv3XaTq1uIfeVysHXq/ 14xjTZQc/QumXu8J0mpT3G1WNvPHfEZ05iFrrbxa7N7fboKSmT4v89CVfCU+p9R/kpN9 sM7a/XbmrUsnfcHrxZHCdUCuCYqCzZ84LkeznzcPFHvzk5JHk7ohtB5y9roAxc1Pqv1E mlYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0AFAgbkgcGIEtvXRGwbGiYKNO0H5y3an4GOotoKqUVA=; b=baXkOodnZjoAh6blNgHoiwf+zhcaLFPqMkbTCQHUk6CNjsbqU1GboKU/8D+vQ6YbU4 QWFEIF6FosL9n121v+N+KqVVVLrALyXn5/xkVg2WhsxSQPdoMgnZD0j7pVyiJ2AWgJhS 72+m8RVhoGxpERq3GsGaunHE5/jVw3UWEfWQgVp23vyQWVktHbj1I3ARYbKK+PHGp7Ji AFV2O0cafUYNbFasf9CE+dbvP2A+tkqgRhnlUkp8JWFZtQOm97odf0zvjE0GLyRIiLdh R8W06TRbeHvLhzpuQyn4guXeYA/Mg7CP/91cNc76leKdrZ4eeJTJdcTX6TP79ONpCcZO ifuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcD4/dyncn+aZkekMZv/u6DEEQ0wTfEoD5UxF5dS66VDJPUjEL3/ oJAnga8Vb/nPzuUdpj8Dx2DaOdc6Kw==
X-Received: by 10.31.94.7 with SMTP id s7mr14990038vkb.49.1495648592140; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.49.18 with HTTP; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9d1552b8-b69f-ac14-e28b-2905bd5e5692@gmail.com>
References: <9d1552b8-b69f-ac14-e28b-2905bd5e5692@gmail.com>
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 10:56:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOW+2dtRYXcnzUnP3cZKKNXJ1FxJPwMw3hmb349KpbLJwQD5FA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
Cc: "perc@ietf.org" <perc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114e1dfe0b1f2b055048d393"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/I_9TalGHXJk9B4hw77OBw5Pq0vM>
Subject: Re: [Perc] PERC LIte
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 17:56:35 -0000

Thanks for posting this.

Question:  In terms of API support, how is the crypto-algorithm specified?
So far, the proposed API just has the key.

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Sergio Garcia Murillo <
sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all again,
>
> Also to start the discussion about 5), I would like to introduce again my
> proposal for a "PERC Lite" approach.
>
> The main objectives and key points of this proposal are:
>
>    - Minimum viable PERC implementation
>    - Minimize impact on both endpoints and MD
>    - OHB is carried in the RTP payload (Encrypted Payload Header).
>    - No changes to the DTLS/SRTP code/api/standards
>    - No RTP E2E Header extensions
>    - RTX/FEC/RED is supported HBH without any change to current
>    standards/implementations.
>
> Best regards
>
> Sergio
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Perc mailing list
> Perc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email