Re: [Perc] PERC LIte
Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com> Wed, 24 May 2017 21:51 UTC
Return-Path: <agouaillard@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2C9129BF7 for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.688
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fzImP4acK9UT for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x232.google.com (mail-vk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EEE1129494 for <perc@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id p85so82641197vkd.3 for <perc@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=h/pBBTw+2LH0e7dAAAA0427wW9L2f+xHF0J8xVo3COk=; b=Rz+YRmPrTaXGk23h3uKde9uEiUgL14bZHE90yOdFonwS+AKZLLs2PJ3IgKcE2ha1Bd TjkdBvRgr5GpujrJY7Y/wo9HudCRqgd907KWQ4nuQbmAltRP+pG5F22wB2oNmmsc59y8 xHRxFMrcBpeIZfWfumdyvVogT7genJFfJfrP3J/L5Z+tyOpsCOfuvJCBJwONtThjBxt1 +Vo1/82xjhIdChGGst+yXaGHZs+XT7J/Uo7AcRspimjagzek4TUAdNHHeyyo5rH9iPUk aU2TDRDUlGw4kifMCGH3o696CvI6glQBT2VKKzm1azygAQzvZCAf0O8w9U654jf3akK1 cMog==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h/pBBTw+2LH0e7dAAAA0427wW9L2f+xHF0J8xVo3COk=; b=XozRFzEKD6oc2i+IEGL7i5KbBc93X5sc9Gm1ORzZIVK24LWAl4TExv/yepqUary4T5 Cerng39ZyweRJAnZ2KJOE1Sdqpwi23mu02c1HqQV9N1h7LXhiFsRvmoVOUbqR1paGSvm pJDQwaYZKpeAuOGdViHe3e0s5saQg9+W9FhVSZEiTVA44oltl3s8O8orMSlcgQmCd4QW XZ5ovDUbXut2lY4megevRC0gY3yMU2XTTEoty7xa4sW5b4T62fZZFYGI5eJzbU6o0JyV 0jT7O6qVcIU8AoVKOfEOPJitCE7B+eJEraBpq6dqEE78PzHtayUXrJdmJAMAs0wA4RR4 zgfg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBO11gIg5B8PiApyOCCPiRE+k4uxw0V13yh2Lqtr1XaaQciFP0J QCPGCQ5c425e+sXwTZLMZ6NGe1nZww==
X-Received: by 10.31.76.132 with SMTP id z126mr8587111vka.137.1495662701580; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.49.73 with HTTP; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHgZEq4fNmF4WBzfcUVcVyN=5ywjaCYbBz4i+xzVAoDK8E9BqA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9d1552b8-b69f-ac14-e28b-2905bd5e5692@gmail.com> <CAOW+2dtRYXcnzUnP3cZKKNXJ1FxJPwMw3hmb349KpbLJwQD5FA@mail.gmail.com> <1adbb700-b61e-b283-6e29-ff3b5fd0d5ee@gmail.com> <CAHgZEq46mBQMEcQY-EM36s5_8FWCLJx9nrDo6FX4DA6COmmUYA@mail.gmail.com> <D54B71A7.6E93C%mzanaty@cisco.com> <CAHgZEq4fNmF4WBzfcUVcVyN=5ywjaCYbBz4i+xzVAoDK8E9BqA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 07:51:40 +1000
Message-ID: <CAHgZEq7htYkOG8aq_vsLyg1sQHLQyj109AKum0vNpiUmpskjFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com>
Cc: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>, "perc@ietf.org" <perc@ietf.org>, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114dc2d408194105504c1c75"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/wNUKFD0IJT79HmWcCI55UN2DSX8>
Subject: Re: [Perc] PERC LIte
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 21:51:45 -0000
also, it would only be the E2E keys. so it does not change anything to existing DTLS-SRTP / webrtc mechanisms. On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com > wrote: > you re' right, those API are not to be exposed to the pass-by internet. > > <rant> Alas, as Martin and ear stated in 2014 when asking about making the > screensharing mechanism consistant across browsers, "it's a security > matter, and the security matters are the prerogative of the browser > vendors". So we might end up with extensions in chrome, and profile in > Firefox. </rant> But normal webpages' JS won't have the capacity to set > keys. > > The security aspects are not forgotten, and were/are included in the > proposal that was circulated to Chrome and Mozilla teams back in November > last year. > > I just wanted to give an heads-up to Bernard about it coming his way in > the immediate future. > > ;-) > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) <mzanaty@cisco.com> > wrote: > >> Keys in JS app signaling/APIs??? Have we come full circle back to SDES??? >> >> Seems like PERC lite would weaken not strengthen the security of >> DTLS-SRTP / WebRTC apps, if JS can inject keys to ignore DH, defeat PFS, >> etc. >> >> Confused, >> Mo >> >> From: Perc <perc-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Alexandre GOUAILLARD < >> agouaillard@gmail.com> >> Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 5:14 PM >> To: Sergio Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> >> Cc: "perc@ietf.org" <perc@ietf.org>, Bernard Aboba < >> bernard.aboba@gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: [Perc] PERC LIte >> >> bernard, >> >> Good point. >> >> i'm discussing with peter T, and proposal for webrtc WG and ORTC CG API >> extensions are coming your way this week. Sergio did it at the >> PeerConnection level while peter is advocating an Api at the >> RTPSender/Receiver level. Of course, the crypto-algorithm needs to be an >> input variable as well. >> >> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Sergio Garcia Murillo < >> sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Bernard, >>> >>> Yes, the example API is just the lazy approach I have taken on my >>> modified chromium, hardcoding the key to AES-GCM 256 so I didn't have >>> to add an object to the IDL and worry about how to retrieve later on the >>> c++ code. >>> >>> The API should allow to set the key and look more like: >>> >>> * const pc = new RTCPeerConnection({ mediaCrypto : { key : >>> 'VEhJUyBJUyBUSEUgMzIgS0VZIFdJVEggMTIgU0FMVCBET1VCTEUgUEVSQyE=', suite : >>> 'AEAD_AES_256_GCM' } });* >>> >>> Anticipating the security comments, I don't expect that to be the final >>> API for WebRTC, which IMHO should be a similar mechanism as the one in >>> place for IdP (or even integrated with it), but I feel that that discussion >>> should take place on the RTCWeb group and not here. >>> >>> Best regards >>> Sergio >>> >>> >>> On 24/05/2017 19:56, Bernard Aboba wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for posting this. >>> >>> Question: In terms of API support, how is the crypto-algorithm >>> specified? So far, the proposed API just has the key. >>> >>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Sergio Garcia Murillo < >>> sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all again, >>>> >>>> Also to start the discussion about 5), I would like to introduce again >>>> my proposal for a "PERC Lite" approach. >>>> >>>> The main objectives and key points of this proposal are: >>>> >>>> - Minimum viable PERC implementation >>>> - Minimize impact on both endpoints and MD >>>> - OHB is carried in the RTP payload (Encrypted Payload Header). >>>> - No changes to the DTLS/SRTP code/api/standards >>>> - No RTP E2E Header extensions >>>> - RTX/FEC/RED is supported HBH without any change to current >>>> standards/implementations. >>>> >>>> Best regards >>>> >>>> Sergio >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Perc mailing list >>>> Perc@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Perc mailing list >>> Perc@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Alex. Gouaillard, PhD, PhD, MBA >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------------ >> President - CoSMo Software Consulting, Singapore >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------------ >> sg.linkedin.com/agouaillard >> >> - >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Perc mailing list >> Perc@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc >> >> > > > -- > Alex. Gouaillard, PhD, PhD, MBA > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------ > President - CoSMo Software Consulting, Singapore > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------ > sg.linkedin.com/agouaillard > > - > > -- Alex. Gouaillard, PhD, PhD, MBA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ President - CoSMo Software Consulting, Singapore ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ sg.linkedin.com/agouaillard -
- [Perc] PERC LIte Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [Perc] PERC LIte Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Perc] PERC LIte Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [Perc] PERC LIte Alexandre GOUAILLARD
- Re: [Perc] PERC LIte Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [Perc] PERC LIte Alexandre GOUAILLARD
- Re: [Perc] PERC LIte Alexandre GOUAILLARD
- Re: [Perc] PERC LIte Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [Perc] PERC LIte Richard Barnes
- Re: [Perc] PERC LIte Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [Perc] PERC LIte Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [Perc] PERC LIte Sergio Garcia Murillo