[Perc] AD review of draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 20 May 2021 07:21 UTC
Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4A13A0E5B; Thu, 20 May 2021 00:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id avbnyaNty1qY; Thu, 20 May 2021 00:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x930.google.com (mail-ua1-x930.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::930]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 929483A0E59; Thu, 20 May 2021 00:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x930.google.com with SMTP id d30so5248503uae.13; Thu, 20 May 2021 00:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=DJbi+mCMD/ZgEpOVITX6Er8I8cPifspsX7uGBKem8ro=; b=iQWhc4rUq6yL5IM85R1Tp656EXLUBfvs40El7DPD/LG5wq2FHIycXdcjPzLtegc4Bf rYF7b+QoJUGlSFoFGIlF6kL4b0jNYAjEV2xwLofHRQ6JT2RwYl2IWrrTuFkfVlvEnIdE IYWzO1EHUjXPpkcZkYYbrl/mi1XHHikOH8c0NUulPHIEx1e8rH77jIwLF9EtoycZ3udp EPWlzYUfbkdCAO99ADx+QEX/4sl6k+AUF3mWsb1XkutQkRw4fIcLIdiTSCC7LTRfyLpq eKkJ42hwitlHHME4hlG1iDTib6ZJ4hWwciSUxB6fBU93B2akSuPtEGIk2o3rDn2N9JIg 2cHg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=DJbi+mCMD/ZgEpOVITX6Er8I8cPifspsX7uGBKem8ro=; b=IpDGDF6So6AqkGvfTtti6en0s+3Opy8z4pblXpyXCpVE6KC5z1wx8zYfIaRyIVx5GO lKZNb6OBp7QkDEN7mInYB0B3d/osG7IPi5U+teJL1MR06ZPQr9NZI2zWFmBdRf82Z34E 7e41EekGf9MPybhrNW9kkqJu9mLnGwPs7A7A10HJtbCO92qb7RDAl64Ij3ZwcTs+MVJK uuGvtA2EtgcxamQmxlDnbW3IwmExOY0uirqsL42FIsGSQr88qY4mIMFIXM6gdcTc+HC/ gyljwtDxXFv+eLFNilQRNuNIhZz92p/OaLL66PBai0Ub53FXp3QQ2QiOY6pUB8lw6KfN 4OYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533lNDdGHd5PCss9VlVMq/WfJuau4XMpNtvr4SDa9pgooEbYh93E EQapWowQdQvLQt5hKrhUHqXViFMdzILog4Zx6xeeE3gTOEY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzavWMthoeU+DfketjEfgSBFfEf9u1H/3h0dnairf/JPjs6rt2gN0VKWbjbWuoun33scFoNsSTdkJBfpMiYJxw=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:44a6:: with SMTP id n35mr3008177uan.101.1621495265916; Thu, 20 May 2021 00:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 00:20:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbOMD8Gs4+Higx9QxkPfke+BJiBtHKPPPPm73j6SemgWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: perc@ietf.org, perc-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000054794105c2bdc9c3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/OswKLAJmZxTx-6pMoLW7g5FgXys>
Subject: [Perc] AD review of draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 07:21:10 -0000
Hi all,
I've completed my AD review of this document. The only feedback I think
I'd like to call out here before issuing an IETF Last Call is a few points
about Section 8:
* the last line has an "if" instead of an "of"
* the RFC reference right after that appears funny ("[!@RFC####]"); did it
not render correctly?
* saying the remaining range is "reserved for future reservations" seems
contradictory to me; "reserved" usually means "not available", but I
actually think you mean "available" for new registrations that pass IETF
Review, correct?
-MSK
- [Perc] AD review of draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Perc] AD review of draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunn… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [Perc] AD review of draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunn… Murray S. Kucherawy