IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Perc] AD review of draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 27 May 2021 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780433A1335; Thu, 27 May 2021 08:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cFkSH3-aIxPX; Thu, 27 May 2021 08:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe32.google.com (mail-vs1-xe32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DCA13A1332; Thu, 27 May 2021 08:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe32.google.com with SMTP id m9so575077vsq.5; Thu, 27 May 2021 08:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5N6AZIIQBiwgTfC78Gj+sbpCGh72bxFeCrYXoom0Moo=; b=Z7wzvPuR8S3cDxWRxZBFJ5KQobxCh2Z1nNyEhWa5Kmd7nsyCIzjmGwWP7cGbFCpkwr K/sAi8iU00QRDAyHvl8nHi1nV7cFSs8QinSaM02j+7wCFRo9mzx1H6QN71wjonB6rGaP NQ4cX+LNr2Id5k7wxArBC3lb3/i53UrMpnj81IRQkipTNXm1R2iXACxJRRcHJctksP8l 2d+DrcHXT0G1mAwFEBjCE7fB8WQ5Ro4IyrNpUrdmSnbjCk9EPQMC2vG5mc5S6qfcGb3z jYRI418jjCIdwMCe2sgcfTcL5BUkMzLZJLcRUdoVm8aZzlfZI0L24Y65B9vUiG+MC9dT hnCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5N6AZIIQBiwgTfC78Gj+sbpCGh72bxFeCrYXoom0Moo=; b=AQ5tqGYTrW5F1Dz9Nhm6GAyEIK4unsndwIzxR7WKNUJ9cDnDOxlTzGWFeZNS6VYfEQ JelW+fIMk2skDfQcaoZvOWbNp4VOVLsqaMA+GH/0T0vCU3/JMpyPcsJ4OPNzVSlw6tW4 /dwS4oFkOs8g8QEOAaw4xCMGFXSx13vhYTcMnIUnHUmNxrvNdMfrM2pIwZ9MN/wvhsnh Oqr5v8rBLNoiKrAVj3SekVdPC3m1NAQ5Gsr7B1o4+nL6FrsLSDZbq/abH59Vgy8tGUET J6L0+yVKQAeL6s8Cv4xy+eo9Ik4jRDHEGPFOjnpEsJbGMzbg3e6oF9FRf/+x1TgWVqnf hJnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533LtennSKyqzgSHLlrgso6H2Yhki75HuYSKil4Ds5JI/FDCv2J5 KANH5GDg4YgizcSbVbGXomEWPKGeUsydXatElnFaAqtMl58=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxoHucmRJ88Ovv181WLPvIkXo7YXvwk1qGIMocXMhty124oMfQml/4POJ/PL3XWZ7Dvqmjr+gkcrCqtNj3O9nU=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:f702:: with SMTP id m2mr3321298vso.40.1622129442279; Thu, 27 May 2021 08:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwbOMD8Gs4+Higx9QxkPfke+BJiBtHKPPPPm73j6SemgWg@mail.gmail.com> <emba354cb1-6488-478b-883c-470cc1dee5be@sydney>
In-Reply-To: <emba354cb1-6488-478b-883c-470cc1dee5be@sydney>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 08:30:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYB+RYAFC8DpWfn4sWOO_954CLD35OgSx856SFwR5ucMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
Cc: perc@ietf.org, perc-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002fd5e305c35171b8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/xP0wPCwDe80IE93umCA27g8JNbY>
Subject: Re: [Perc] AD review of draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 15:30:49 -0000

Great, thanks!

On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 7:29 AM Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com> wrote:

> Murray,
>
> Thanks.  The funny syntax has been fixed; user error. :)
>
> I changed the reserved language and moved two related paragraphs together:
>
> >>> CHANGED
> The value 0x00 is reserved and all values in the range 0x06 to 0xFF are
> available for allocation.  The procedures for updating this table are
> those
> defined as "IETF Review" in section 4.8 of [@!RFC8126].
> <<<<
>
> (That is the syntax that will produce the correct result.)
>
> I also renamed the table to be "Message Type Values" rather than "Data
> Type Values".  Everywhere else, these are described as "message types" (and
> the table header said the same).
>
> Paul
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
> To: perc@ietf.org; perc-chairs@ietf.org
> Sent: 5/20/2021 3:20:54 AM
> Subject: [Perc] AD review of draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've completed my AD review of this document.  The only feedback I think
> I'd like to call out here before issuing an IETF Last Call is a few points
> about Section 8:
>
> * the last line has an "if" instead of an "of"
>
> * the RFC reference right after that appears funny ("[!@RFC####]"); did it
> not render correctly?
>
> * saying the remaining range is "reserved for future reservations" seems
> contradictory to me; "reserved" usually means "not available", but I
> actually think you mean "available" for new registrations that pass IETF
> Review, correct?
>
> -MSK
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email