IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Tue, 19 November 2013 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D271ADF98 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 04:47:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NxVAu3mFOej3 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 04:47:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa0-x22c.google.com (mail-oa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040961ADF7A for <perpass@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 04:47:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id m1so617717oag.3 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 04:47:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pfjX5NapyT+mKYBjfp+do03tAetCJpuJFN6Kg1v1MNY=; b=oZAfNbiHu3NguiSRFHuYKRRI3skXC4hnIYJiq8d7dAuLHjp4Oh+7V1tYvVB4yu46eW dLOBR2LCNvuKqrSKTUh2DPmOciDV1o526op2N6S1gG0cJhUME71DG+yey/asQZDE65yc 80YlbCeR7krzb2Yk61JVzA1IIgfmACyAlZ2+I9VBSGRgHk9pbii/4wJDfoSWwIsqman9 sBOWTbQktft5qDWkx4fcgwfjyBE6TpStYY7P/8bsKM+VLIEtMyW+SX6qHTE3mGMAhLxK m7MngQXr8k+7xZIXYdm9uC3/69EDtLn9KhJxKIUk31j5jllsf0bayYb/i63mgUm12vZJ l69Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.179.113 with SMTP id df17mr25346900oec.16.1384865249939; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 04:47:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.48.9 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 04:47:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.48.9 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 04:47:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20131119100239.GB12744@nic.fr>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20131114043212.0cb4b710@elandnews.com> <5284C802.8070403@grothoff.org> <20131119100239.GB12744@nic.fr>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 07:47:29 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPv4CP8Ey8Q9eUPn9ptHpLTHxgxzd5MPWYNcZsfPhwcu+vkoGw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e011609bc48dbdb04eb8711fa"
Cc: Christian Grothoff <christian@grothoff.org>, perpass <perpass@ietf.org>, "Hellekin O. Wolf" <hellekin@gnu.org>, Matthias Wachs <wachs@net.in.tum.de>, Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@appelbaum.net>, SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: [perpass] draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:47:37 -0000

IESG Approval isn't a document status, it's a policy definition for
namespace value assignment.

It looks to me like RFC 6761 could have been better phrased. It describes
the registry and says that to add to it, an RFC must be published that
specifies new entries and the entries must be categorized either IESG
Approval or Standards Action... for how they are approved as registry
entries. It does not (mean to) say that the RFC itself should have status
of IESG Approval.

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email