IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00

SM <sm@resistor.net> Tue, 19 November 2013 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157EA1ADFE8 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 06:04:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vv8hJMD2ZLmV for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 06:04:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBD51ADFE6 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 06:04:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAJE498D006469; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 06:04:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1384869854; bh=S7BA5HBdIl6O/6nmgytUY7tW+bLvVjLZ4xp2Gv/Ji2g=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=XvtybyJaOF+EkvCVvWIaGbgOaOu+gJlo8rgo3BIuHyjZIv3plWKL3SROGUexczrdQ f90gLG5smI69kw8/MAjZtemHlYVsxHHBpM2lBa1XQwi7imBPBviPrR9qtb0dXNu4ES yXuaq+4aKqxQKGI0QIRYHcQ5I47Z5Ww2KjIrxZY4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1384869854; i=@resistor.net; bh=S7BA5HBdIl6O/6nmgytUY7tW+bLvVjLZ4xp2Gv/Ji2g=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=op1fRqjBiU1iy+mw3vnd0t7NDHgKiYYHs8OHSFa9gDVqCLS8I7XTgREL+agbj8MRm FeUN+JQW9gqEqLrj16qs9p3H4C+qgcFUJSqJwT5Eb6oJPp1dlP3qDCYbNbbSVG1N9x gRn2iIVq0ygo5kxoNkhHxyUTNj9BYASglc/9OSxU=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20131119034817.0d2f8468@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 03:58:41 -0800
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20131119095844.GA12744@nic.fr>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20131114043212.0cb4b710@elandnews.com> <20131119095844.GA12744@nic.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: perpass@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [perpass] draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:04:23 -0000

Hi Stephane,
At 01:58 19-11-2013, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>RFC 5226
>
>IESG Approval - New assignments may be approved by the IESG.
>             Although there is no requirement that the request be
>             documented in an RFC, the IESG has discretion to request
>             documents or other supporting materials on a case-by-case
>             basis.

That text is about assignments within the purview of the IETF.  It is 
better to avoid turf wars unless there is a good reason.  Saving the 
Internet is usually not considered as a good reason. :-)

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email