[perpass] Lauren Weinstein on Explicit Trusted Proxy in HTTP/2.0: "One of the Most Alarming Internet Proposals I've Ever Seen"

"Andreas Kuckartz" <a.kuckartz@ping.de> Mon, 24 February 2014 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <a.kuckartz@ping.de>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A061A0104 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:21:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.613
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.613 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, T_FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6b1P4vLmMnzU for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:21:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lilly.ping.de (lilly.ping.de [83.97.42.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DC2E81A0100 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:21:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 8776 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2014 15:21:36 -0000
Received: (ofmipd 83.97.42.23); 24 Feb 2014 15:21:14 -0000
Received: from 85-22-102-0.ip.dokom21.de ([85.22.102.0] helo=127.0.0.1) by lucy.ping.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <a.kuckartz@ping.de>) id 1WHxLb-0000KI-CH for perpass@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:21:36 +0100
Date: 24 Feb 2014 16:21:34 +0100
Message-ID: <530B637E.4020308@ping.de>
From: "Andreas Kuckartz" <a.kuckartz@ping.de>
To: "perpass" <perpass@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perpass/Gu4xp5izyiLmHujghMRCpI3QVD4
Subject: [perpass] Lauren Weinstein on Explicit Trusted Proxy in HTTP/2.0: "One of the Most Alarming Internet Proposals I've Ever Seen"
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:21:43 -0000

No, I Don't Trust You! -- One of the Most Alarming Internet Proposals
I've Ever Seen
http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/001076.html

The name of that HTTPBis Working Group draft already sounds suspicious:

Explicit Trusted Proxy in HTTP/2.0
draft-loreto-httpbis-trusted-proxy20-01
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-loreto-httpbis-trusted-proxy20-01

I do not know the details of the processes of the IETF:
What can I do to help kill that proposal?

Cheers,
Andreas