Re: [perpass] Cops hate encryption but the NSA loves it when you use PGP

Hugo Maxwell Connery <hmco@env.dtu.dk> Sun, 31 January 2016 22:19 UTC

Return-Path: <hmco@env.dtu.dk>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230391B2DDE for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 14:19:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.829
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.829 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_DK=1.009, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GM1U3ewGaksK for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 14:19:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spamfilter2.dtu.dk (spamfilter2.dtu.dk [130.225.73.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5391A1B2DDD for <perpass@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 14:19:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ait-pexedg02.win.dtu.dk (ait-pexedg02.win.dtu.dk [192.38.82.192]) by spamfilter2.dtu.dk with ESMTP id u0VMJZVO011559-u0VMJZVQ011559 (version=TLSv1.0 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=CAFAIL) for <perpass@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 23:19:35 +0100
Received: from ait-pex02mbx04.win.dtu.dk (192.38.82.184) by ait-pexedg02.win.dtu.dk (192.38.82.192) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.266.1; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 23:19:33 +0100
Received: from ait-pex01mbx01.win.dtu.dk ([169.254.1.238]) by ait-pex02mbx04.win.dtu.dk ([169.254.4.6]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 23:19:35 +0100
From: Hugo Maxwell Connery <hmco@env.dtu.dk>
CC: "perpass@ietf.org" <perpass@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [perpass] Cops hate encryption but the NSA loves it when you use PGP
Thread-Index: AQHRW35//Zhzbc8M6kq0P47Hz+a6zp8UTzKAgAAS+ACAAAWwAIABga2AgABHMoY=
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:19:34 +0000
Message-ID: <6CB05D82CE245B4083BBF3B97E2ED47016E34B7E@ait-pex01mbx01.win.dtu.dk>
References: <56ACE9FF.3080606@dcrocker.net> <56ACFFE5.5000506@cs.tcd.ie> <5295c0797c43debce5367771cd87fdfb.w00t@mrkoot.com> <394C9C42-5E56-4271-A90B-8486D4A16011@icsi.berkeley.edu>, <56AE581B.7050507@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <56AE581B.7050507@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: en-AU, da-DK, en-US
Content-Language: en-AU
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.225.73.250]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perpass/dY2OAndzyumLn6TqEfQtPvTZzwk>
Subject: Re: [perpass] Cops hate encryption but the NSA loves it when you use PGP
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:19:41 -0000

Hi,

Out of rare curiosity I actually read the comments to the 
article.  The take out was that people are both generally
pissed off about all the mass surveillance, and they
were proposing/suggesting/arguing various reasonably
considered response arguments.

Of course there was a bit of flaming, but I was rather 
satisfied to see a collection of reasonable
responses to the "encryption is dangerous"
contents of the article.

Of note was the general complaint that the site only uses http.

So, whilst the tech community does its best to respond to
the challenge of human rights abusing mass surveillance,
some parts of the general community are learning/thinking
about the problem and conversing about it.

This, I take as the most positive part of this standard
"encryption is bad" rubbish.

Regards,  Hugo