Re: [perpass] Web-of-trust CAs

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sun, 17 November 2013 09:33 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1B611E8209 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 01:33:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XskJFp+zlyka for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 01:33:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F232011E8962 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 01:33:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1VhyjK-0004EL-Te; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 09:33:23 +0000
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 18:33:21 +0900
Message-ID: <m2siuv5q5a.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: DataPacRat <datapacrat@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB5WduDGEDBJnAo_PssDix7B+e_OkvC_j4+p8-X=BW-1cJ7BCA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAB5WduAHhQg2a5Lc4CTTe0pxYt7V3n0XsRqtuY3Acg117AatMg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwi9SBRpz0kdojiwpzkruSMi3PNZ98wMp_yL4uCT+pZdKw@mail.gmail.com> <CAB5WduBbSO9iD2JY7Q0sbSKMBpes12BDAfKfwd=siiZ=ncrPhg@mail.gmail.com> <52668970.4080500@bbn.com> <CAB5WduCY+tE16RviFK_yC2nLPBTYkDYS_PePkNNXwoo9MJqYzA@mail.gmail.com> <5266ECF2.5020901@bbn.com> <CAB5WduDGEDBJnAo_PssDix7B+e_OkvC_j4+p8-X=BW-1cJ7BCA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: perpass <perpass@ietf.org>, Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Subject: Re: [perpass] Web-of-trust CAs
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 09:33:56 -0000

> I'm not familiar with many of the details of DANE and RPKI. Do either
> of them provide any protection against a subpoena attack?

dane does, rpki does not and this is a major issue

randy