Scope [was Re: [Pesci-discuss] Fw: (from Techspec) Non-Author Editing]

In fact, I should mention that the PESCI team hasn't been able to
reconvene since the BOF, for various travel and related reasons,
so we haven't really decided what to do in the way of cleaning
and tidying the draft. Bert is quite right in terms of the next steps
discussion in the BOF - yet I also detect some interest in the general
list of principles which we accidentally started. We may simply need
to fork the discussion and split the document. I was planning to think
about that after people have had a few days to check the draft
minutes.

     Brian

Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> My apologies!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Spencer
> 
> 
>> And above all, if this were a principle to be listed,
>> it is NOT a principle for "the process change process" I think.
>> I.e. we are (or so I think) outside the scope of the chartered
>> pesci activity.
>>
>> Bert
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pesci-discuss mailing list
> Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss
> 

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss