IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pesci-discuss] Fw: (from Techspec) Non-Author Editing

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Wed, 23 November 2005 06:37 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EeoGH-0003Qb-IY; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:37:45 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EeoGF-0003PL-UW for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:37:44 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA17254 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:37:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org ([69.25.196.178] helo=carter-zimmerman.mit.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EeoYz-0003aw-UV for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:57:07 -0500
Received: by carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 20C18E0074; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:37:30 -0500 (EST)
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] Fw: (from Techspec) Non-Author Editing
References: <036e01c5ef85$704d9a70$56087c0a@china.huawei.com>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:37:30 -0500
In-Reply-To: <036e01c5ef85$704d9a70$56087c0a@china.huawei.com> (Spencer Dawkins's message of "Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:54:39 -0600")
Message-ID: <tsly83f98et.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Cc: PESCI Discuss Mailing List <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

>>>>> "Spencer" == Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org> writes:

    Spencer> I'm thinking there's an IETF principle behind Brian's "as
    Spencer> long as" caveat that looks something like

    Spencer> Working groups are responsible for the text of
    Spencer> specifications they develop from the point of adoption as
    Spencer> a working group draft until publication. The working
    Spencer> group controls all changes to the text of a working group
    Spencer> draft.

I don't think this is true.  I think an IETF consensus can and should
be able to change the text of a WG draft over a WG objection.


_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email