Re: [Pesci-discuss] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-davies-pesci-initial-considerations-01.txt]

Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org> Fri, 20 January 2006 08:09 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EzrLJ-0007jX-3P; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:09:57 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EzrLG-0007hM-Vl for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:09:55 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA19214 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:08:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EzrTx-0002Ep-50 for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:18:54 -0500
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com ([171.71.177.237]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2006 00:09:44 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.01,203,1136188800"; d="scan'208"; a="1768438199:sNHT31253604"
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k0K89hQi000040; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:09:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:09:43 -0500
Received: from [10.86.242.55] ([10.86.242.55]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:09:42 -0500
Message-ID: <43D09AC6.7060104@employees.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:09:42 +0100
From: Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051201 Thunderbird/1.5 Mnenhy/0.7.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-davies-pesci-initial-considerations-01.txt]
References: <43C92D1B.8040103@zurich.ibm.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601161542050.5861@netcore.fi> <43CBA9CC.6040601@dial.pipex.com>
In-Reply-To: <43CBA9CC.6040601@dial.pipex.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jan 2006 08:09:42.0872 (UTC) FILETIME=[DE50F580:01C61D98]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

On 01/16/2006 15:12 PM, Elwyn Davies allegedly wrote:
> Pekka Savola wrote:
>> 1) I still can't believe P6 wasn't removed already.  The bar for
>> making process change proposals is too high already -- why should we
>> need to add, "oh by the way, please redesign our current process
>> documents while you're at it.. THANKS!".  This doesn't seem productive.
>>
>>    P6. The revised process should be documented in a new set of coherent
>>        and comprehensive documents, rather than updates to the existing
>>        ad hoc set.
>>
>>
> Apologies; That is a dropoff.  P6 was *supposed* to have vanished.  I
> think that actually this a part of the problems and you will find that
> there is a new item 10 in the problems.

But P6 is still a good idea, wouldn't you say?

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss