IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: address portability

Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu> Thu, 16 July 1998 02:50 UTC

Delivery-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 22:59:25 -0400
Return-Path: cclark
Received: (from adm@localhost) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) id WAA01122 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 22:50:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tipper.oit.unc.edu (tipper.oit.unc.edu [152.2.22.85]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with SMTP id WAA01056 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 22:40:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (ses@localhost) by tipper.oit.unc.edu (8.6.12/8.6.10) with SMTP id WAA08794; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 22:40:47 -0400
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 22:40:47 -0400
From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: John Day <day@bbn.com>
cc: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@RESEARCH.ATT.COM>, Patrick Greenwell <patrick@namesecure.com>, "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>, ietf@ietf.org, List@giaw.org, comments@iana.org, discussion-draft@giaw.org
Subject: Re: address portability
In-Reply-To: <v0311070db1d2ab5eb8a1@[128.89.30.6]>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.00.9807152233160.8768-100000@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"

On Wed, 15 Jul 1998, John Day wrote:
> Noel, you want to explain this or is it worth it?
[Noel Chiappa had a farm EIEID...] 

If no-one has any objection, I will setup a daemon to automically post
random postings from the big-internet archive until we all travel
sufficiently far back in time that we can prevent the spice girls from
meeting.

ObLibel: Postel didn't write 793 - bacon did

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email