[pim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4601 (3727)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 16 September 2013 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728EF11E81A7 for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.86
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.86 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.140, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_61=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SekMG98w-k5y for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93A811E8196 for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 16C49B1E00B; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
To: fenner@research.att.com, M.Handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk, holbrook@arastra.com, kouvelas@cisco.com, stbryant@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, stig@venaas.com, mmcbride7@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20130916194621.16C49B1E00B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:46:21 -0700
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:52:33 -0700
Cc: ctbrown@cisco.com, pim@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [pim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4601 (3727)
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pim>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 19:52:43 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4601,
"Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4601&eid=3727

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Christopher Brown <ctbrown@cisco.com>

Section: 4.6.1

Original Text
-------------
A6:  Store new assert winner as AssertWinner(S,G,I) and assert
      winner metric as AssertWinnerMetric(S,G,I).
      Set Assert Timer to Assert_Time.
      If (I is RPF_interface(S)) AND (UpstreamJPState(S,G) == true)
      set SPTbit(S,G) to TRUE.

Corrected Text
--------------
A6:  Store new assert winner as AssertWinner(S,G,I) and assert
      winner metric as AssertWinnerMetric(S,G,I).
      Set Assert Timer to Assert_Time.
      If (I is RPF_interface(S)) AND (UpstreamJPState(S,G) == Joined)
      set SPTbit(S,G) to TRUE.

Notes
-----
The UpstreamJPState(S,G) should be 'Joined' not 'true'.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC4601 (draft-ietf-pim-sm-v2-new-12)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised)
Publication Date    : August 2006
Author(s)           : B. Fenner, M. Handley, H. Holbrook, I. Kouvelas
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Protocol Independent Multicast
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG