Re: [pim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4601 (3727)

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 16 September 2013 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB53C11E80FC for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.26
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.26 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.261, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_61=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cCyYu8CT2qbW for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3623421F8F4A for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r8GK0wGj029221; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 21:01:00 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r8GK0vSr029199 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Sep 2013 21:00:58 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: pim@ietf.org
References: <20130916194621.16C49B1E00B@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130916194621.16C49B1E00B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 21:00:58 +0100
Message-ID: <079d01ceb317$76d9d490$648d7db0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJWadDYnwORzQUVPyVQFIehpiW61pi5WuFg
Content-Language: en-gb
Cc: ctbrown@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [pim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4601 (3727)
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pim>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:01:47 -0000

PIM WG and 4601bis authors,

Please look at Christopher's Errata report, let me know, and make the necessary
updates to the draft.

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]
> Sent: 16 September 2013 20:46
> To: fenner@research.att.com; M.Handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk; holbrook@arastra.com;
> kouvelas@cisco.com; stbryant@cisco.com; adrian@olddog.co.uk;
> stig@venaas.com; mmcbride7@gmail.com
> Cc: ctbrown@cisco.com; pim@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4601 (3727)
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4601,
> "Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification
> (Revised)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4601&eid=3727
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Christopher Brown <ctbrown@cisco.com>
> 
> Section: 4.6.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> A6:  Store new assert winner as AssertWinner(S,G,I) and assert
>       winner metric as AssertWinnerMetric(S,G,I).
>       Set Assert Timer to Assert_Time.
>       If (I is RPF_interface(S)) AND (UpstreamJPState(S,G) == true)
>       set SPTbit(S,G) to TRUE.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> A6:  Store new assert winner as AssertWinner(S,G,I) and assert
>       winner metric as AssertWinnerMetric(S,G,I).
>       Set Assert Timer to Assert_Time.
>       If (I is RPF_interface(S)) AND (UpstreamJPState(S,G) == Joined)
>       set SPTbit(S,G) to TRUE.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The UpstreamJPState(S,G) should be 'Joined' not 'true'.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC4601 (draft-ietf-pim-sm-v2-new-12)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM):
Protocol
> Specification (Revised)
> Publication Date    : August 2006
> Author(s)           : B. Fenner, M. Handley, H. Holbrook, I. Kouvelas
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Protocol Independent Multicast
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG