[pim] [Errata Verified] RFC7761 (7857)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 20 March 2024 21:25 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8E9C151524; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.657
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eugbawpOIfhk; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36982C14CE53; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id E14AA1D51; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
To: alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com, fenner@arista.com, m.handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk, holbrook@arista.com, kouvelas@arista.com, riparekh@cisco.com, zzhang@juniper.net, vero.zheng@huawei.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240320212526.E14AA1D51@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:25:26 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/B2un8rpWt6tGH6X0sTQ6uiw3c9Q>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 16:15:09 -0700
Subject: [pim] [Errata Verified] RFC7761 (7857)
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 21:25:31 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC7761, "Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7857 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Alexander Okonnikov <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2024-03-19 Verified by: RFC Editor Section: 4.6.5 Original Text ------------- bool lost_assert(S,G,I) { if ( RPF_interface(S) == I ) { return FALSE } else { return ( AssertWinner(S,G,I) != NULL AND AssertWinner(S,G,I) != me AND (AssertWinnerMetric(S,G,I) is better than spt_assert_metric(S,I) ) } } Corrected Text -------------- bool lost_assert(S,G,I) { if ( RPF_interface(S) == I ) { return FALSE } else { return ( AssertWinner(S,G,I) != NULL AND AssertWinner(S,G,I) != me AND AssertWinnerMetric(S,G,I) is better than spt_assert_metric(S,I) ) } } Notes ----- Excessive parenthesis before 'AssertWinnerMetric(S,G,I)'. -------------------------------------- RFC7761 (draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601bis-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised) Publication Date : March 2016 Author(s) : B. Fenner, M. Handley, H. Holbrook, I. Kouvelas, R. Parekh, Z. Zhang, L. Zheng Category : INTERNET STANDARD Source : Protocols for IP Multicast Stream : IETF
- [pim] [Errata Verified] RFC7761 (7857) RFC Errata System