[pim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7761 (7857)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 19 March 2024 08:26 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE329C14F686 for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 01:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.959
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.959 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xWFAwJpI7TLX for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 01:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC681C14F604 for <pim@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 01:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 774461456DC; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 01:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com, fenner@arista.com, m.handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk, holbrook@arista.com, kouvelas@arista.com, riparekh@cisco.com, zzhang@juniper.net, vero.zheng@huawei.com, pim@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240319082612.774461456DC@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 01:26:12 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/SM3whtnfwAvlI7pjFA8-qK6QzNY>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:38:02 -0700
Subject: [pim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7761 (7857)
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:26:16 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7761,
"Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7857

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Alexander Okonnikov <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com>

Section: 4.6.5

Original Text
-------------
     bool lost_assert(S,G,I) {
       if ( RPF_interface(S) == I ) {
          return FALSE
       } else {
          return ( AssertWinner(S,G,I) != NULL AND
                   AssertWinner(S,G,I) != me  AND
                   (AssertWinnerMetric(S,G,I) is better
                      than spt_assert_metric(S,I) )
       }
     }

Corrected Text
--------------
     bool lost_assert(S,G,I) {
       if ( RPF_interface(S) == I ) {
          return FALSE
       } else {
          return ( AssertWinner(S,G,I) != NULL AND
                   AssertWinner(S,G,I) != me  AND
                   AssertWinnerMetric(S,G,I) is better
                      than spt_assert_metric(S,I) )
       }
     }

Notes
-----
Excessive parenthesis before 'AssertWinnerMetric(S,G,I)'.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC7761 (draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601bis-06)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised)
Publication Date    : March 2016
Author(s)           : B. Fenner, M. Handley, H. Holbrook, I. Kouvelas, R. Parekh, Z. Zhang, L. Zheng
Category            : INTERNET STANDARD
Source              : Protocols for IP Multicast
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG