IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pim] Call for adoption of sr-mpls-multicast-framework

Uma Chunduri <umac.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 13 August 2018 11:03 UTC

Return-Path: <umac.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C96130EBF for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 04:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bs0dyPy049jh for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 04:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x933.google.com (mail-ua1-x933.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::933]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A9CB127598 for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 04:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x933.google.com with SMTP id f4-v6so8670900uao.10 for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 04:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PNPNj7Ar/oiAYuSukdt4pcu/D/FlY7JfpsZ3m5+PL8E=; b=XbCAohOjCQJfQXzgrAMI3Zh1Ft+H9g4dsNu/aC/ru7NNZp8sFbhwwQpFABwQSiWd0C SMbY20b2JN3HAd0Dbdx8Mg1Tdff1m8iqzeHe4Pk8vVqofHJ4NlEaInQZu1FrZBavW4Bv 7VTbfUO/CidRYyfiE9EV6ZiVC1aEvyurRHBWWkWgZqEFP5iwowi0kECUWr5+HPP/nQxZ BlEme+A1qkzRyKcadMr1WqR3OAhg5mY88Ewj47GZo2uxvpBKLYAJYmrP/vDQ0Pu59U9x gCgDE9VBCgqIhwdDLvMHQV5oY6v08p+oOK0QEJ8nI6bfcoFhzY0NrZNfhqUwWvWKuvDl D9XQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PNPNj7Ar/oiAYuSukdt4pcu/D/FlY7JfpsZ3m5+PL8E=; b=mXc0TVLpgxubhg2/CYfXRfEm9uNuUIMcYQFAHJbPTnG68WxLUOmH2oO+zC8oovaZJU x7vZKIGkUIDBbWPGsKBH9Jt/Vy7WmEqffloN9zQw9WHI6hG+w4PJSdFQfhzYWqJ8+QxE zoTR+AXRww6sovaTUbKpoAi6l5Qi6wtYZN06+Pmv56MNesV3K9v5OSjzdTeqO2s0r5O1 fCrFK7VNxJ6b4YJlX7l4COmIpdfIZUts4VYRa/spitIH6YYaLrOVqQ5u9/tKZLvRQlJf bj3nGBgxpVUqqLW1kjx9zOPQVCteWtCMAB0+xqkDVPScwMNnA0m2FjDAoybu5j7aNPN5 bevA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlH6VM/SIYIWRa/STRlLCQ/eCTwUd/hDKv1A5sVuc6wasNLsSZh5 3oAviYG65iQCjvutWQZnsC3Vcn9gbHSCVngzsIDcMQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPw0noCboOVX4qe2jhnaGhcPlEldOYaA0DSDBYZA4QJ5XlqDQXKr+slpvjFvRj3HzNqgtdEDsknDZrC7KvApxNs=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:26ce:: with SMTP id m197-v6mr10652652vkm.115.1534158229963; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 04:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a67:153:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 04:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Uma Chunduri <umac.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 04:03:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAF18ct7eU6TpZ_7BhJTAVhd+wuEjz6q1JgiAWh30ov6P-ybi5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: pim@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005387a205734f0c72"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/ONdJx2ee6Vu29DpdFzaOP2kW8r0>
Subject: Re: [pim] Call for adoption of sr-mpls-multicast-framework
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 11:03:53 -0000

FWIW-

This is definitely a novel approach and support this work..

But

a)would like to see a next version as promised by  Dave (for Eric's
comments).

b)Hope, some of the comments made by Toerless can be accommodated too in
future versions.

c) Would like to see more elaboration on the computation impact on IGPs
overall


--
Uma C.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email