IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pim] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case-09: (with COMMENT)

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Thu, 02 December 2021 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C42F3A0A14; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 13:05:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ZYvQthJkvP8; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 13:05:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C523A09E2; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 13:05:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id y13so2953245edd.13; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 13:05:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YrCz63chLAWqtJJD93cMYFG/9fbG3KxRFPQmeqCxOBA=; b=c2ZKedFV56mApoW5vz7uXteMBc23Av454rekAwxngPfcmwlerh4HVasjEO9IEHOWsV lNs2EAwfd7LbeO7zU63BNdB6AU80jHUOqN51fAXznqM31aB378NGgLO/S/4UACJuqwFa gwouA79h3TMnn+TceLt7y+icgCs/+HP4ofXKa3JBBua2ro5uwU0wqeAWjxfJA2jJv2u1 iYLgMdiU3GxFTaTuar8GI9xnXeg0wXQ/EmTsuVq3QLUJwi44Iq2Ti/tmFhYHcCyKXzyN ZAp2d1116OWQgpRAYWYnRzPXckzoCkO15ijmafwChPJQoawMvS4EQ5TE5ZM8eqM38ZVu oZXw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YrCz63chLAWqtJJD93cMYFG/9fbG3KxRFPQmeqCxOBA=; b=qFGoXyqz6djc9FP4j6h+NaKKzWR6+yLZYEIGhNzsukcnSR0ct9HUX00aF6eE7Opoqn Znf68LZ2ZiPPlT2vUWRhnpVIfl20KkAUtXt74RW/FdGczgmlXp8O3qITifNKo6NiVW4h nlbuFiITsvooUNHeAJwIrtDg0MtE2SbstkKODJmDSTknAdwMl3gNPzGepQscFdl4Fcvb jO5KHmJjB/Mhg4ydVFb1qdP94wiPauAcFpy1hNhxEzEgqtoXa1SThYdLqNPevnQ42WGU PARbs0g8gtMoNMpzfcsQFb+i/lbjrODSyQZ/iy+pC0ObeuF8xFniju0OqhBVfFIHF0ul dDVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5309Jw/nOSroUBTHKjqw7mhmwGbVwAEXQ50nP4vCX65+aInp0Q6y crCHE4kL5TSONkMNhx2LyaOBiCdEVVTCTT87WEPeEkzlC54=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw1w+3lnncmW4glzi2MRe1MaV0sONXgvFdf6A/2dNuSdBoeAhvTbL1Z6uGuVm4mZZ7+e2sOOAfDPK0fZXuxdWI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:60cf:: with SMTP id hv15mr17356019ejc.561.1638479110514; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 13:05:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <163845422469.18086.7145471306159245451@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <163845422469.18086.7145471306159245451@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 13:04:59 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmU7-KpFGv4ip1wp1BAs5eN+A9-x8p3R2OFv+GoxX4jSnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case@ietf.org, pim-chairs@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org, mmcbride7@gmail.com, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005aac9e05d2302581"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/fNDoQ4ugploIL_2zqhBRSAUBOSE>
Subject: Re: [pim] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 21:05:23 -0000

Hi Zahed,
thank you for your review and the suggestion. Would an informative
reference to Section 8.6 Congestion Control in RFC 5424 <http://rfc5424> as
an example of the throttling mechanism be helpful?

Regards,
Greg

On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 6:10 AM Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case-09: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This short document looks good to me and thanks for working with it.
>
> I have one comment -
>
> - It would be great to have the "throttling logging mechanism" explained or
> provide reference for further details. This will help the reader understand
> better.
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email