IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pim] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case-09: (with COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 03 December 2021 06:29 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032E63A13BF; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 22:29:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QLYUqH1o4gt3; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 22:29:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92a.google.com (mail-ua1-x92a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C07423A13BE; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 22:29:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92a.google.com with SMTP id w23so3586384uao.5; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 22:29:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/ysqD+dd+s/ueq7s9BNFZ7JDgvC6Hg/LXTHNWNiGWqE=; b=g6uJE+6k6bdtmlklgdRlbksFsPrF5u0VvQluNAMVDIXJIeymdMVtGFqa3MzXjzeD5p WDfo+4bRS872NqQagk3S6321KKNQdvc7LF1/LRJPvjtAwZwN8YxNx5nCZNc5uy3Ldp/W C8KghQkojqsuE9NRmbs5yyngHAN8hwih2IxyUlyfyO9krl6yZW9ji/5SvU3lapq6A2RZ aD+hSxJFV87iGcORaqsV1Mh+4RAFXZP+8jddm7wVkLJ7n+/+BJ0jWTyAFll5WFoPVPSx HgpDI4c8clMQtA6AJ1FJ58mhakmZEG8pq6r0YJn9IJehzaqxJ19hlGF1zmfdOKMJu6Qm zXYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/ysqD+dd+s/ueq7s9BNFZ7JDgvC6Hg/LXTHNWNiGWqE=; b=x3zWBmyTNcxaYratLOtdPGEb236sfNNHfRH7J7Q2b243E8y5kT8wz9C8hx5NVaVD8X ub9U+e1XjlpHRFFQdSdv9xXgZVmAlrJJbfye2g5ZIqkA/4FABzxtpmJDgMKZR2eDkDUj mXJxYYqo45D0YvefV7u9bythUR/bTqlqDVV5MyluSTpzLTMlcKVTrLkfu2HMTd55mbTK svWYPylI9kP/W8R8eqm6eALkwLtoH96POzYbX7Sp0PMGfZUBAQ0jaaewAE9MWbP8Zwq0 MITUWI4e2/FyDPNOs9broiZJwDkTu4PwUy4Z/cn8Ep0owqjmwKDbX9GtzdXxEvcMFjhT X5ug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531FLEqJh110Oz//h1nkmI2JR/rqDVbkEoZ8s2nFEy3UL+yZBgvd Ppa6AgMZz5LIw8N0Umqzc+nPft5kd4pHAg3vZ7k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxkMc/FIxpJ07PIbeKzUxlY7KM+QQIRPCGacsMtC0fhjpWrT6fMOe1eG1LPdOlaw4TJsqrKySVTvo75CIC7/k=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:dca:: with SMTP id e10mr20380527vst.66.1638512938291; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 22:28:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <163842363000.18680.9191645629146040729@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+RyBmVNizvkrYw_RAKN4KJZjAyDx-xvvT0=a-OHjtdtt7Owig@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmVNizvkrYw_RAKN4KJZjAyDx-xvvT0=a-OHjtdtt7Owig@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 22:28:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaSiO63Oit2uw8gib5ez8045gAH96fPZm3SR8EGP65GHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case@ietf.org, pim-chairs@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org, mmcbride7@gmail.com, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a5959d05d238052e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/y3d193SOsVPtpw2QmQZ-0GxjmNU>
Subject: Re: [pim] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2021 06:29:02 -0000

HI Greg,

On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 12:56 PM Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:

> The alternative to what is required in RFC 8562 is also listed in that
> paragraph - "stop transmitting BFD control packets". I think that it will
> be right to s/SHOULD/MUST/ in Section 2.1 of the draft. What is your opinion
>

I think that's quite reasonable.  Is it the same for the SHOULD in the
final paragraph of that section?

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email