Re: [pim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601bis-00.txt

Rishabh Parekh <rishabhp@gmail.com> Tue, 11 October 2011 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rishabhp@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F139821F8CC0 for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3+fmKyrzdYSq for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA8521F8E82 for <pim@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iaby26 with SMTP id y26so10893577iab.31 for <pim@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/ichWXCjzjrkPBnBtQ2ExuMH+wsyTY+M/mDSVS0fhO0=; b=aNnO1UMHryf5h3mlNmhcj9GXIcuUX1hFz4nfbI0O5J5XkKOH7I80ZbV8KHtYH6k/gD 8NeDHRnl8REh314sfTzvudcjScCNi0alP4I7wdQTj0EyNgdcPdL6aUN2HR8T7y+XXhgR KpEVSTJjLxBgN8wy2wODugNE8wk0oYfEkCe4I=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.8.78 with SMTP id g14mr10590957ibg.85.1318352815475; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.200.194 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6C565C0133EA3F478AEC8F5ADB52726A0ACE143F5F@USFWA1EXMBX3.itt.net>
References: <20111003214532.25066.68116.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6C565C0133EA3F478AEC8F5ADB52726A0ACE143F5F@USFWA1EXMBX3.itt.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:06:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CABjMoXZh7M13oEQVkuCfD-v4ReGUPQHj4x6d8ttcoqg4BUj6GQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rishabh Parekh <rishabhp@gmail.com>
To: "Nicholas, Jonathan - ES" <Jonathan.Nicholas@itt.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001517740d16414e3b04af08ef95"
Cc: "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pim>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:06:57 -0000

Jonathan,
When we decided to remove (*,*,RP), we realized that PMBR functionality as
specified in 4601 would not work without (*,*,RP) state. Hence, we decided
to remove Appendix A.

Regards,
-Rishabh.

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Nicholas, Jonathan - ES <
Jonathan.Nicholas@itt.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> In reviewing this draft, I notice that Appendix A has been removed.
>
> While I can understand removing the (*,*,RP) due to lack of deployment
> experience, there was a fair amount of useful information that did not
> involve (*,*,RP) in Appendix A.
>
> Is this also due to lack of deployment experience, or is there another
> reason?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Jonathan Nicholas
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> > internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 5:46 PM
> > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> > Cc: pim@ietf.org
> > Subject: [pim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601bis-00.txt
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> > directories. This draft is a work item of the Protocol Independent
> > Multicast Working Group of the IETF.
> >
> >       Title           : Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
> > (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised)
> >       Author(s)       : Bill Fenner
> >                           Mark Handley
> >                           Hugh Holbrook
> >                           Isidor Kouvelas
> >                           Rishabh Parekh
> >                           Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang
> >                           Lianshu Zheng
> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601bis-00.txt
> >       Pages           : 132
> >       Date            : 2011-09-29
> >
> >    This document specifies Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
> >    (PIM-SM).  PIM-SM is a multicast routing protocol that can use the
> >    underlying unicast routing information base or a separate multicast-
> >    capable routing information base.  It builds unidirectional shared
> >    trees rooted at a Rendezvous Point (RP) per group, and optionally
> >    creates shortest-path trees per source.
> >
> >    This document addresses errata filed against RFC 4601, and removes
> >    the optional (*,*,RP) feature that lacks sufficient deployment
> >    experience.
> >
> >
> > A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601bis-00.txt
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> > This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601bis-00.txt
> > _______________________________________________
> > pim mailing list
> > pim@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the
> sender.
> Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
> those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ITT
> Corporation. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for
> the presence of viruses. ITT accepts no liability for any damage caused by
> any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
> _______________________________________________
> pim mailing list
> pim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
>