Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4210 (7888)

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Tue, 09 April 2024 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77649C14F6A5 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 09:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OQ7JQ3GaCPfy for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 09:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82f.google.com (mail-qt1-x82f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 992BDC14F603 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 09:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82f.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4345f35daa7so15993641cf.0 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 09:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; t=1712678668; x=1713283468; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=YS08WuTzwnlVtwQA5HoKeHKZDFGogVqCMJJ3B+0er80=; b=eTi6tM+AFCTftvOOnuSM9KeSXbsMAaxLryOW0sWQQEt6C/klo82yYf9xng3O5aw+QC NGWce4n4Ukb+0opvI8huPNZMg/xzGRnM3uixxQFALhXIf3aQbAyPHsHfcPa113Jc6G3W otrbp/IBMvn9NteSVPErmABPsEeByBsgsNNSs=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712678668; x=1713283468; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YS08WuTzwnlVtwQA5HoKeHKZDFGogVqCMJJ3B+0er80=; b=B49VXfCrn5pgkIHhE0jTUo0u4sXaGxLe/V2RuSFEYG0vlf+PW6bW/wR1AambE4AGaH 0K3B8Rc2WTq+E5XmOcgzJwCug6euyrcAk2NyF/w6epn/IyP88243w+M2Kdv+yDg20gVm x+kX01MeBFHNsYZPccFHwr/KjfA4uKRMfd2t29LSrxQYh2TDDjaNIwyY0vfsxib5QyLX HjtlUv4tr1/llFW7fZR904iqrRr1YtpKiaykwL3RmVu0yCOF97btNIalyzlPReaWEyyt r+rAZmIluViACswNXZ1I9PseOdiGLAR5AtH0naWLBjtJb/kI+WaQkxoU2p7zCYU8OedN q2vQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVQgF4cGaLibVOWNq0REjehkoGe9X6Xxl6QuhMF1ZSoEd6sL2yLs7YYS6Op4T+Yudv7k0ONsP5MZWRbLSxT
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YybFsIaeeyPEFwCF0USdWUYOiDFvrdNFlxnb9UeUDtNbVY+/8Na F07xEDo4K8jXg9NgNoZ6Jw1PmEvphmUGqW2M1qgUzQEIFxdoY8P19it3q9Tg2I/EbwGkT4WeoVN q
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGFxTCz0ZEXwsO1Xv7tCJyr3NgqkjZVqbTXvkanylss6wDvIFFziUn5ANw5qSDfauSl2oIBng==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2a8e:b0:699:2ad4:3dc4 with SMTP id jr14-20020a0562142a8e00b006992ad43dc4mr12816800qvb.42.1712678667739; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 09:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2a00:79e1:abd:dd02:50d5:402f:8727:6411]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y17-20020a056214017100b0069044802760sm4130955qvs.120.2024.04.09.09.04.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Apr 2024 09:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.15\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240409125456.3A2E45BDD44@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 12:04:26 -0400
Cc: toka@ssh.com, pkix@ietf.org, cadams@site.uottawa.ca, tmononen@safenet-inc.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F4D58A32-E03C-47DF-AF8C-7CB3026E5A1C@sn3rd.com>
References: <20240409125456.3A2E45BDD44@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>, sylvain.etienne@dadboo.eu
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/3q0FhCWKfDto1OF7LNNc34F1r58>
Subject: Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4210 (7888)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 16:04:34 -0000

Sylvain: Thanks for marking this as editorial.

Deb: I think it can be marked as hold for document update.

I have submitted the following PR on draft-ietf-lamps-rfc4210bis to address this:
https://github.com/lamps-wg/cmp-updates/pull/61

spt

> On Apr 9, 2024, at 08:54, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4210,
> "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7888
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Sylvain Etienne <sylvain.etienne@dadboo.eu>
> 
> Section: 5.3.2.
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> An Initialization response message contains as the PKIBody an
> CertRepMessage data structure,
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> An Initialization response message contains as the PKIBody a
> CertRepMessage data structure,
> 
> Notes
> -----
> typo
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC4210 (draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2510bis-09)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)
> Publication Date    : September 2005
> Author(s)           : C. Adams, S. Farrell, T. Kause, T. Mononen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkix mailing list
> pkix@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix