IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4210 (7888)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 09 April 2024 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB45C14F69B for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 10:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vigilsec.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZtWrQbelXUWx for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 10:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53600C14F603 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 10:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADFA765F8; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 13:24:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45143768AC; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 13:24:58 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.1\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240409125456.3A2E45BDD44@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 13:24:47 -0400
Cc: sylvain.etienne@dadboo.eu, IETF PKIX <pkix@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9C87DB58-3BE0-49FC-ADC9-AF8D8B2B653A@vigilsec.com>
References: <20240409125456.3A2E45BDD44@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.1)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vigilsec.com; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=pair-202402141609; bh=jB6UPWV7SJXq+CeER9ARyePSBMuTJMkwkZE7ccqz7a4=; b=Sjz5JTdA/pd8/uW9fYnVEvaAYlUQ415wuQG8oohCG9G39XVI6cq17zSfnTVtKuWkKp08lS8Nvgz0I6Z6KkVOCvwwUnwdSwSDeZcNUxQ0qhdG8H6H1U5vPNC5zgdssARdzs2svs24cB7sG1PQKlFILxZoIdrKKZjHFXfVxpHGD/9njXZaJrdHr5Ibpl0xcI/X+j9UpzPLKlrzoQkpGQSCqdvCNJ7NsfM63T7g47syQS0szW+JLiSR2Wv3O6YAFRxkUdV3q4skhNkNMkt4kTM+RRABA5TEg6uVI9ASoJHtFz2nhrj7vfgRoz+I5Wvk1FAGSbfemr/xR05DlRc8tml7CQ==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/kl4lCZinXAF3mzSzo2CErhbfWmo>
Subject: Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4210 (7888)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 17:25:04 -0000

I suggest "Hold for Document Update"

Russ


> On Apr 9, 2024, at 8:54 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4210,
> "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7888
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Sylvain Etienne <sylvain.etienne@dadboo.eu>
> 
> Section: 5.3.2.
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> An Initialization response message contains as the PKIBody an
> CertRepMessage data structure,
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> An Initialization response message contains as the PKIBody a
> CertRepMessage data structure,
> 
> Notes
> -----
> typo
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC4210 (draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2510bis-09)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)
> Publication Date    : September 2005
> Author(s)           : C. Adams, S. Farrell, T. Kause, T. Mononen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email