Re: Call for agenda items & PRQP

Massimiliano Pala <Massimiliano.Pala@Dartmouth.EDU> Thu, 05 March 2009 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-pkix-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pkix-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFC63A6ACA for <ietfarch-pkix-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 03:59:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9MG3YJBT8d4a for <ietfarch-pkix-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 03:59:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C953A6980 for <pkix-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 03:59:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n25BYrW3005319 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 04:34:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n25BYrBC005318; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 04:34:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mailhub1.dartmouth.edu (mailhub1.dartmouth.edu [129.170.16.122]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n25BYf1q005298 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf-pkix@imc.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 04:34:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from Massimiliano.Pala@Dartmouth.edu)
Received: from newblitzen.Dartmouth.EDU (newblitzen-shared.dartmouth.edu [129.170.20.37]) by mailhub1.dartmouth.edu (8.13.5/DND2.0/8.13.5) with ESMTP id n255FsL7032075 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 06:31:22 -0500
X-Disclaimer: This message was received from outside Dartmouth's BlitzMail system.
Received: from wifi365.ogf25.garr.it [90.147.29.111] by newblitzen.Dartmouth.EDU (Mac) via SMTP for id <143331912>; 05 Mar 2009 06:31:21 -0500
Message-ID: <49AFB7F5.10307@Dartmouth.edu>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 06:31:01 -0500
From: Massimiliano Pala <Massimiliano.Pala@Dartmouth.EDU>
Organization: Dartmouth College - Computer Science Department
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stefan Santesson <stefans@exmsft.com>, Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>, pkix <ietf-pkix@imc.org>
Subject: Re: Call for agenda items & PRQP
References: <C5D2D31A.7B5%stefans@exmsft.com>
In-Reply-To: <C5D2D31A.7B5%stefans@exmsft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms030202080706010903050505"
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean by mailhub.Dartmouth.EDU
X-MailScanner-From: massimiliano.pala@dartmouth.edu
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

Ciao Stefan, Steve, and pkix-wg,

I would need 10 mins for reporting on the activities about PRQP - we have been
working both with the TERENA (TACAR) and Federal Bridge folks and they are going
to deploy PRQP (at least as experimental). Some interest in the PRQP has also
been expressed by some commercial vendors... so I think that the WG should be
informed of these activities.

Also, from the collaboration with the DHC WG, we have changed the draft and it
seems that we need IANA to assign identifiers for DHCP (both v4 and v6).

One concern that I have is that IANA would not be so keen in assigning DHCP
service identifiers for an experimental-track protocol, but the deployment
of PRQP is actually happening and I would like to have at least those identifiers
standardized before this actually happens. I am not sure about what we shall do
now. The PRQP will be included in the next release of OpenCA as well, therefore
there will soon be a quite large installation base (besides the aforementioned
communities).

Shall we move the status from experimental to standard track ? Is it too early ?
I see that within the WG there is not much activity about PRQP, but in the real
PKI world and Computing Grid communities the situation is different.

I would like to know the opinion of the chair(s) and the people in the WG...

Ciao,
Max


Stefan Santesson wrote:
> IETF in San Francisco is coming up.
> 
> PKIX has a 2.5 hour session directly on the Monday morning March 23 at 0900
> 
> Please let me know if you have anything you whish to present at the meeting.
> *_At least one representative of each active WG document MUST inform me 
> if you need a time slot for that document or not.
> _*
> I would like to have your request for timeslot by Wednesday March 11.
> After that we can always do late adjustments but I appreciate to have 
> your request as early as possible.

-- 

Best Regards,

	Massimiliano Pala

--o------------------------------------------------------------------------
Massimiliano Pala [OpenCA Project Manager]  Massimiliano.Pala@dartmouth.edu
                                                  project.manager@openca.org

Dartmouth Computer Science Dept               Home Phone: +1 (603) 369-9332
PKI/Trust Laboratory                          Work Phone: +1 (603) 646-9179
--o------------------------------------------------------------------------

People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us
who do.
							   -- Isaac Asimov