IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for agenda items & PRQP

Stefan Santesson <stefans@exmsft.com> Wed, 11 March 2009 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-pkix-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pkix-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE86A3A6BAB for <ietfarch-pkix-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.689
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.689 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.560, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HiItboYD2J7L for <ietfarch-pkix-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98AF03A6980 for <pkix-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n2BCuX2m008119 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Mar 2009 05:56:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n2BCuX3f008118; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 05:56:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from s87.loopia.se (s87.loopia.se [194.9.95.112]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n2BCuKIq008102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf-pkix@imc.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 05:56:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from stefans@exmsft.com)
Received: (qmail 64404 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2009 12:56:24 -0000
Received: from s34.loopia.se (HELO s19.loopia.se) ([194.9.94.70]) (envelope-sender <stefans@exmsft.com>) by s87.loopia.se (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for <ietf-pkix@imc.org>; 11 Mar 2009 12:56:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 26626 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2009 12:56:19 -0000
Received: from 90-229-233-249-no153.tbcn.telia.com (HELO [192.168.0.17]) (stefan@fiddler.nu@[90.229.233.249]) (envelope-sender <stefans@exmsft.com>) by s19.loopia.se (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for <Massimiliano.Pala@Dartmouth.EDU>; 11 Mar 2009 12:56:19 -0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:56:14 +0100
Subject: Re: Call for agenda items & PRQP
From: Stefan Santesson <stefans@exmsft.com>
To: Massimiliano Pala <Massimiliano.Pala@Dartmouth.EDU>, Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>, pkix <ietf-pkix@imc.org>
Message-ID: <C5DD737E.CB4%stefans@exmsft.com>
Thread-Topic: Call for agenda items & PRQP
Thread-Index: AcmiSMJs+qUBggAD8kCICLmIM6BuIQ==
In-Reply-To: <49AFB7F5.10307@Dartmouth.edu>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

Max,

What you say is very interesting. First of all sort out the IANA issue.
Secondly we should discuss a possible upgrade of this document to standards
track based on the deployment.

You have your time slot.

/Stefan


On 3/5/09 12:31 PM, "Massimiliano Pala" <Massimiliano.Pala@Dartmouth.EDU>
wrote:

> Ciao Stefan, Steve, and pkix-wg,
> 
> I would need 10 mins for reporting on the activities about PRQP - we have been
> working both with the TERENA (TACAR) and Federal Bridge folks and they are
> going
> to deploy PRQP (at least as experimental). Some interest in the PRQP has also
> been expressed by some commercial vendors... so I think that the WG should be
> informed of these activities.
> 
> Also, from the collaboration with the DHC WG, we have changed the draft and it
> seems that we need IANA to assign identifiers for DHCP (both v4 and v6).
> 
> One concern that I have is that IANA would not be so keen in assigning DHCP
> service identifiers for an experimental-track protocol, but the deployment
> of PRQP is actually happening and I would like to have at least those
> identifiers
> standardized before this actually happens. I am not sure about what we shall
> do
> now. The PRQP will be included in the next release of OpenCA as well,
> therefore
> there will soon be a quite large installation base (besides the aforementioned
> communities).
> 
> Shall we move the status from experimental to standard track ? Is it too early
> ?
> I see that within the WG there is not much activity about PRQP, but in the
> real
> PKI world and Computing Grid communities the situation is different.
> 
> I would like to know the opinion of the chair(s) and the people in the WG...
> 
> Ciao,
> Max
> 
> 
> Stefan Santesson wrote:
>> IETF in San Francisco is coming up.
>> 
>> PKIX has a 2.5 hour session directly on the Monday morning March 23 at 0900
>> 
>> Please let me know if you have anything you whish to present at the meeting.
>> *_At least one representative of each active WG document MUST inform me
>> if you need a time slot for that document or not.
>> _*
>> I would like to have your request for timeslot by Wednesday March 11.
>> After that we can always do late adjustments but I appreciate to have
>> your request as early as possible.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email