Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3779 (6792)
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 22 December 2021 05:59 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607C53A0E0E for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 21:59:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hdnnL-ePRcML for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 21:59:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 914EB3A0E08 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 21:59:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B33300C51 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:59:15 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id lgDfgNXbx81C for <pkix@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:59:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7A3B300AC4; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:59:12 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211221184313.8407B12108F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:59:08 -0500
Cc: Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com>, IETF PKIX <pkix@ietf.org>, tb@openbsd.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FD62FC2A-2939-4E6D-A623-24CEAB11EC23@vigilsec.com>
References: <20211221184313.8407B12108F@rfc-editor.org>
To: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>, Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/OLxERtowDDCP-tULZlR7RY_wscs>
Subject: Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3779 (6792)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 05:59:18 -0000
This looks correct to me. I think it should be approved. Russ > On Dec 21, 2021, at 1:43 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3779, > "X.509 Extensions for IP Addresses and AS Identifiers". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6792 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Theo Buehler <tb@openbsd.org> > > Section: Appendix B > > Original Text > ------------- > 30 3d Extension { > 06 08 2b06010505070107 extnID 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.1.7 > 01 01 ff critical > 04 2e extnValue { > 30 2c IPAddrBlocks { > 30 10 IPAddressFamily { > 04 03 0001 01 addressFamily: IPv4 Unicast > IPAddressChoice > 30 09 addressesOrRanges { > IPAddressOrRange > 03 02 00 0a addressPrefix 10/8 > IPAddressOrRange > 03 03 04 b010 addressPrefix 172.16/12 > } -- addressesOrRanges > } -- IPAddressFamily > 30 07 IPAddressFamily { > 04 03 0001 02 addressFamily: IPv4 Multicast > IPAddressChoice > 05 00 inherit from issuer > } -- IPAddressFamily > 30 0f IPAddressFamily { > 04 02 0002 addressFamily: IPv6 > IPAddressChoice > 30 09 addressesOrRanges { > IPAddressOrRange > 03 07 00 200100000002 addressPrefix 2001:0:2/47 > } -- addressesOrRanges > } -- IPAddressFamily > } -- IPAddrBlocks > } -- extnValue > } -- Extension > > Corrected Text > -------------- > 30 3d Extension { > 06 08 2b06010505070107 extnID 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.1.7 > 01 01 ff critical > 04 2e extnValue { > 30 2c IPAddrBlocks { > 30 10 IPAddressFamily { > 04 03 0001 01 addressFamily: IPv4 Unicast > IPAddressChoice > 30 09 addressesOrRanges { > IPAddressOrRange > 03 02 00 0a addressPrefix 10/8 > IPAddressOrRange > 03 03 04 ac10 addressPrefix 172.16/12 > } -- addressesOrRanges > } -- IPAddressFamily > 30 07 IPAddressFamily { > 04 03 0001 02 addressFamily: IPv4 Multicast > IPAddressChoice > 05 00 inherit from issuer > } -- IPAddressFamily > 30 0f IPAddressFamily { > 04 02 0002 addressFamily: IPv6 > IPAddressChoice > 30 09 addressesOrRanges { > IPAddressOrRange > 03 07 00 200100000002 addressPrefix 2001:0:2/48 > } -- addressesOrRanges > } -- IPAddressFamily > } -- IPAddrBlocks > } -- extnValue > } -- Extension > > Notes > ----- > b010 represents 176.16/12, the hex representation of 172 is ac, so it should be ac10. > > The IPv6 addressPrefix in question is 2001:0:2/48, not 2001:0:2/47, as explained in the text before the example. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC3779 (draft-ietf-pkix-x509-ipaddr-as-extn-03) > -------------------------------------- > Title : X.509 Extensions for IP Addresses and AS Identifiers > Publication Date : June 2004 > Author(s) : C. Lynn, S. Kent, K. Seo > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > pkix mailing list > pkix@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix
- [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3779 (6792) RFC Errata System
- Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3779 (6… Russ Housley
- Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3779 (6… Benjamin Kaduk