Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6818 (4381)
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 29 May 2015 15:35 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354861AC41A for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2015 08:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5cj-_AP7QhYd for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2015 08:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EBE91ACD4F for <pkix@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2015 08:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D2CBF16; Fri, 29 May 2015 16:34:52 +0100 (IST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QdIpR8n-Ru_o; Fri, 29 May 2015 16:34:52 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [134.226.36.180] (stephen-think.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E327BF15; Fri, 29 May 2015 16:34:51 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <5568871B.80300@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 16:34:51 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>, 'RFC Errata System' <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, kent@bbn.com, stefan@aaa-sec.com
References: <20150529110916.D369A180092@rfc-editor.org> <06f501d09a23$e6f47e20$b4dd7a60$@akayla.com>
In-Reply-To: <06f501d09a23$e6f47e20$b4dd7a60$@akayla.com>
OpenPGP: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/Z46sgKfJ6DNUFxCTyVH9ms7lh5w>
Cc: pkix@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6818 (4381)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 15:35:02 -0000
Yep, I asked the RFC editor folks to just delete it. Happens from time to time. S. On 29/05/15 16:26, Peter Yee wrote: > This seems to be junk or a joke. The term "Void Elements" appears nowhere > in RFC 6818, and even if it did, the original text and the corrected text > are the same. The notes make no sense. > > -Peter > > -----Original Message----- > From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] > Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 4:09 AM > To: peter@akayla.com; stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie; > Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com; kent@bbn.com; stefan@aaa-sec.com > Cc: G.F.B.2015@outlook.com; pkix@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6818 (4381) > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6818, "Updates to the > Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate > Revocation List (CRL) Profile". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6818&eid=4381 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Gerard Barlow <G.F.B.2015@outlook.com> > > Section: GLOBAL > > Original Text > ------------- > Void Elements > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Void Elements > > Notes > ----- > Slow the out of control data rate. slim the file system. enhance > performance > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use > "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a > decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the > status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6818 (draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5280-clarifications-11) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Updates to the Internet X.509 Public Key > Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile > Publication Date : January 2013 > Author(s) : P. Yee > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > > >
- [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6818 (4381) RFC Errata System
- Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6818 (4… Peter Yee
- Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6818 (4… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6818 (4… Megan Ferguson