Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6844 (5091)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 18 August 2017 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188821321A3 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x-D7dL-LJh8h for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9D951320D9 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDF3300563 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:14:52 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id uy1pt6EBAvtl for <pkix@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:14:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 586FF300295; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:14:49 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170818150630.12CE1B814E2@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:14:48 -0400
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phillip.hallam-baker@comodo.com>, Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>, IETF PKIX <pkix@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EB29FEE8-AA80-48C7-A935-76CA419C21CB@vigilsec.com>
References: <20170818150630.12CE1B814E2@rfc-editor.org>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/bqPtj4EuXw3mQP7Z3WVSVVouUGg>
Subject: Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6844 (5091)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:14:54 -0000

I do not think the extra space will confuse any implementers.  Also, since the LAMPS WG is considering a charter item to update this document, a resolution of "held for future update" seems right to me.

Russ


> On Aug 18, 2017, at 11:06 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6844,
> "DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5091
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Mak Kolybabi <mak@kolybabi.com>
> 
> Section: 4
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   o  If CAA(X) is not empty, R(X) = CAA (X), otherwise
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   o  If CAA(X) is not empty, R(X) = CAA(X), otherwise
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Remove unnecessary space after second CAA, making appearances of CAA(X) consistent throughout the section.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6844 (draft-ietf-pkix-caa-15)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record
> Publication Date    : January 2013
> Author(s)           : P. Hallam-Baker, R. Stradling
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkix mailing list
> pkix@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix