IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pkix] fyi: Sovereign Keys: an EFF proposal for more secure TLS

Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg> Tue, 20 December 2011 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <tom@ritter.vg>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4BE21F853B for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:33:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8W2uTE50jl+V for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:33:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5317021F853A for <pkix@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:33:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iaen33 with SMTP id n33so1021852iae.31 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:33:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ritter.vg; s=vg; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CnvFRzEqnY8pIAE4JCRe3izXw/yAWoSAksNGmacTD9M=; b=Q8rAQk2u8JdMhi+qOL1zUB6s+APNCnO4AWBmcIig6otYhweMCd12PsR0ACYYNicOqr /V4QfqQIcS3FyXq4no2TrdNkzAWwm3mZ3FrA01lw6VqpU5N5KvE1SXfAJgEHTMqHryXg Yq66h2z358epmsfG9M200hGbt4fnMhLSobqVM=
Received: by 10.50.185.138 with SMTP id fc10mr107590igc.33.1324344789285; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:33:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.19.200 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:32:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <B83745DA469B7847811819C5005244AF0F56EC7B@scygexch7.cygnacom.com>
References: <CAG5KPzwPezCpCJmb2=Y1zvREgB80wA6BvVRB3p_tUcSO62a7aw@mail.gmail.com> <201112151756.pBFHu2RW023233@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp> <20111219175608.4A8E821F8BA8@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMm+Lwgzt_AX==0_ZjYP7QyPqnFDnHCzdxvqjyC239SK+fCP5w@mail.gmail.com> <B83745DA469B7847811819C5005244AF0F56EC7B@scygexch7.cygnacom.com>
From: Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:32:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+cU71=g2BxWmdo0vi4eK9tqKiJuXdMhfTosy+xnTejiN0W5kw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Santosh Chokhani <SChokhani@cygnacom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "pkix@ietf.org" <pkix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pkix] fyi: Sovereign Keys: an EFF proposal for more secure TLS
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 01:33:12 -0000

On 19 December 2011 19:30, Santosh Chokhani <SChokhani@cygnacom.com> wrote:
> DSA parameters are NOT to be inherited from the signed macro or from
> signature field.  They need to come from SPKI or from the Issuer.
>
> What specs are you reading?

The original thread is here:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/current/msg00867.html
[websec] Key pinning for DSA keys with inherited domain params by
James Manger in the websec working group regarding the key pinning
draft.

-tom

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status