Re: [pkix] possible new pkix and/or smime work

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

I got a couple of volunteers, Wei Chuang and John Levine
(thanks both!) who're aiming to produce us a summary of
the recent list discussion we can ponder in a few days.

Cheers,
S.

On 23/03/16 20:35, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I'm finding it hard to evaluate the discussion as to whether
> there's new work folks want to do here that'd justify forming
> a (coherent) WG and that'd result in likely implementation and
> deployment. I expect others may be similarly uncertain.
> 
> Would someone be willing to volunteer to act in a slightly
> chair-like manner and try to summarise the discussion in a
> way that might help us judge the above?
> 
> I think that might help us to e.g. organise a bit of a bar
> BoF or collective chat amongst those interested while a bunch
> of us are in B-A and on the list prior to that.
> 
> Thanks,
> S.
> 
> PS; If you are willing to do that but shy, feel free to send to
> me offlist and I can pretend I did the work:-)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkix mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix
>