Re: [PMOL] FW: [ippm] Fwd: Liaison Statement from the Broadband Forum

It would be probably good if somebody can draft a response and provide
it as feedback as Ron asked initially. The response would probably point
to a number of RFCs that can help the Broadband Forum, probably most of
them resulting from work in IPPM. Based on this Ron and Benoit can sort
out with the Transport ADs who needs to answer the liaison letter. 

I also notice that the letter was also sent to ITU-T SG15Q14 and
SG12Q17. Al Morton is one of the leading contributors (also) in the
ITU-T work, so I suggest that we hear his input. 

Regards,

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pmol-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pmol-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of
> Yaakov Stein
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 5:33 PM
> To: pmol@ietf.org
> Subject: [PMOL] FW: [ippm] Fwd: Liaison Statement from the Broadband
> Forum
> 
> Although I am sure that most of you have already seen this message, I
am
> forwarding it, because I believe that this liaison function should be
> the responsibility of the performance directorate.
> 
> Y(J)S
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ippm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of
> Reinhard Schrage
> Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2012 22:28
> To: Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de; matt@internet2.edu
> Cc: ietf@ietf.org; ippm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [ippm] Fwd: Liaison Statement from the Broadband Forum
> 
> I kind of like the idea of a liaison, as due to the work already done
in
> the IETF there is no need to re-invent already proven standards and
> procedures and both sides may actually benefit.
> 
> Any actions already in place / planned?
> 
> Best regards
> Reinhard Schrage
> t:	+49 (0) 5137 909540
> m:	+49 (0) 172  26.36.046
> reinhard@schrageconsult.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ippm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of
> Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de
> Sent: 10 August 2012 08:34
> To: matt@internet2.edu
> Cc: ietf@ietf.org; ippm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [ippm] Fwd: Liaison Statement from the Broadband Forum
> 
> Matt,
> 
> I've read the liaision statement. The BBF informs us, that they plan
to
> "create a standard set of Broadband performance metrics to address on-
> going regulatory, and consumer performance information needs."
> 
> BBF asks for guidance and support. From the document I couldn't
identify
> the architecture. I personally think IPPM members may volunteer to
> suggest IETF metrics to BBF. But to me that requires that the
> architecture is clearly defined (by BBF).
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ruediger
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ippm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of
> Matthew J Zekauskas
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 1:59 AM
> To: IETF IPPM WG
> Subject: [ippm] Fwd: Liaison Statement from the Broadband Forum
> 
> FYI, if folks here want to review.  Ron wants comments to
ietf@ietf.org.
> 
> --Matt
> 
> -------------------
> 
> Folks,
> 
> The Broadband Forum has sent a liaison statement to the IETF regarding
a
> "New Project - Broadband Access Service Attributes and Performance
> Measures".
> 
> Click on the following link for details:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1179/.
> 
> Please review and send comments to this list.
> 
> --------------------------
> Ron Bonica
> vcard:       www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf
> _______________________________________________
> PMOL mailing list
> PMOL@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmol