[PMOL] FW: [ippm] Fwd: Liaison Statement from the Broadband Forum

Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com> Mon, 03 September 2012 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <yaakov_s@rad.com>
X-Original-To: pmol@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pmol@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7097621F861F for <pmol@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vmbSlxnmOLua for <pmol@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rad.co.il (mailrelay02-q.rad.co.il [94.188.133.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D99521F8564 for <pmol@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Internal Mail-Server by MailRelay02 (envelope-from yaakov?s@rad.com) with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 3 Sep 2012 16:46:09 +0300
Received: from EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il ([192.114.24.28]) by EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il ([192.114.24.28]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:33:07 +0300
From: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>
To: "pmol@ietf.org" <pmol@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Fwd: Liaison Statement from the Broadband Forum
Thread-Index: Ac12iUxanGB/fuvuSKermmvvwbOu4f//0PqAgABuSoCAJP4TAP/+jqyQ
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:33:07 +0000
Message-ID: <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC9045627F6@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.17.141.36]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Commtouch-Refid: str=0001.0A020209.5044BFE0.0162,ss=1,fgs=0
Subject: [PMOL] FW: [ippm] Fwd: Liaison Statement from the Broadband Forum
X-BeenThere: pmol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate list <pmol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pmol>, <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pmol>
List-Post: <mailto:pmol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmol>, <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:34:16 -0000

Although I am sure that most of you have already seen this message,
I am forwarding it, because I believe that this liaison function should be the responsibility
of the performance directorate.

Y(J)S

-----Original Message-----
From: ippm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Reinhard Schrage
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2012 22:28
To: Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de; matt@internet2.edu
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; ippm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ippm] Fwd: Liaison Statement from the Broadband Forum

I kind of like the idea of a liaison, as due to the work already done in the
IETF there is no need to re-invent already proven standards and procedures
and both sides may actually benefit.

Any actions already in place / planned?

Best regards
Reinhard Schrage
t:	+49 (0) 5137 909540
m:	+49 (0) 172  26.36.046
reinhard@schrageconsult.com


-----Original Message-----
From: ippm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de
Sent: 10 August 2012 08:34
To: matt@internet2.edu
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; ippm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ippm] Fwd: Liaison Statement from the Broadband Forum

Matt,

I've read the liaision statement. The BBF informs us, that they plan to
"create a standard set of Broadband performance metrics to address on-going
regulatory, and consumer performance information needs."

BBF asks for guidance and support. From the document I couldn't identify the
architecture. I personally think IPPM members may volunteer to suggest IETF
metrics to BBF. But to me that requires that the architecture is clearly
defined (by BBF).

Regards,

Ruediger


-----Original Message-----
From: ippm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Matthew J Zekauskas
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 1:59 AM
To: IETF IPPM WG
Subject: [ippm] Fwd: Liaison Statement from the Broadband Forum

FYI, if folks here want to review.  Ron wants comments to ietf@ietf.org.

--Matt

-------------------

Folks,

The Broadband Forum has sent a liaison statement to the IETF regarding a
"New Project - Broadband Access Service Attributes and Performance
Measures".

Click on the following link for details:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1179/.

Please review and send comments to this list.

--------------------------
Ron Bonica
vcard:       www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf