TOP second argument
Steve Dorner <sdorner@qualcomm.com> Fri, 03 June 1994 21:49 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12409; 3 Jun 94 17:49 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12405; 3 Jun 94 17:49 EDT
Received: from PO2.ANDREW.CMU.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19830; 3 Jun 94 17:49 EDT
Received: (from postman@localhost) by po2.andrew.cmu.edu (8.6.7/8.6.6) id RAA25474; Fri, 3 Jun 1994 17:47:34 -0400
Received: via switchmail for ietf-pop3+@andrew.cmu.edu; Fri, 3 Jun 1994 17:47:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from po2.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID </afs/andrew.cmu.edu/service/mailqs/q000/QF.YhvuGP:00UdaJXL051>; Fri, 3 Jun 1994 17:46:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (ux1.cso.uiuc.edu [128.174.5.59]) by po2.andrew.cmu.edu (8.6.7/8.6.6) with SMTP id RAA25431 for <ietf-pop3@andrew.cmu.edu>; Fri, 3 Jun 1994 17:45:56 -0400
Received: from dorner.slip.uiuc.edu by ux1.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP id AA01374 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <ietf-pop3@andrew.cmu.edu>); Fri, 3 Jun 1994 16:45:38 -0500
Received: from [192.17.5.3] by dorner.slip.uiuc.edu with SMTP id AA06312 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for <ietf-pop3@andrew.cmu.edu>); Fri, 3 Jun 1994 16:46:00 -0500
X-Sender: sdorner@192.17.5.1
Message-Id: <aa155379020210169a30@[192.17.5.3]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 1994 16:45:35 -0500
To: ietf-pop3@andrew.cmu.edu
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Dorner <sdorner@qualcomm.com>
Subject: TOP second argument
Another unclear area in the spec is whether: TOP 1 0 is an error or a valid way to get just the headers of a message. I don't care one way or the other, since I was long ago forced to use TOP 1 1 because of servers who assumed that 0 was invalid. -- Steve Dorner, Qualcomm Incorporated "There's nothing wrong with you that can't be cured with a little Prozac and a polo mallet." - Woody Allen
- TOP second argument Steve Dorner
- Re: TOP second argument John Gardiner Myers