IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ppsp] Request: draft-cruz-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol as WG item

zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com> Thu, 20 December 2012 02:45 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E9321F88A3 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:45:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.739, BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OrQZClvuJkgh for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:45:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imss.chinamobile.com (imss.chinamobile.com [221.130.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0340621F889D for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:45:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imss.chinamobile.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.chinamobile.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1086AE446; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:45:57 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mail.chinamobile.com (unknown [10.1.28.22]) by imss.chinamobile.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FC5E43B; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:45:57 +0800 (CST)
Received: from zyf-PC ([10.2.43.220]) by mail.chinamobile.com (Lotus Domino Release 6.5.6) with ESMTP id 2012122010455472-47833 ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:45:54 +0800
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:45:52 +0800
From: zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
To: 'Rui Cruz' <rui.cruz@ieee.org>, ppsp <ppsp@ietf.org>
References: <1388AC0A-2E2E-4EE5-8868-688E7BE6E252@cisco.com> <EC14A918-B208-411A-902C-994297E0035C@cisco.com> <50A21BF4.9010102@cs.vu.nl> <52529918-0790-47C2-84D0-A1D11FE14129@ieee.org> <50A344CA.6060307@cs.vu.nl> <35D4DB2A-7468-490C-8147-FA9E5FF69B50@ieee.org> <50ACCF90.6080308@cs.vu.nl> <67029FDA-544B-4D28-AC12-A36EDC73957B@ieee.org>, <50D01CB3.6070206@cs.vu.nl>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.85[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2012122010455215506537@chinamobile.com>
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on jtgsml01/servers/cmcc(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2012-12-20 10:45:54, Serialize by Router on jtgsml01/servers/cmcc(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2012-12-20 10:45:56, Serialize complete at 2012-12-20 10:45:56
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart844536186774_=----"
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.8231-6.8.0.1017-19466.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--29.673-7.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--29.673-7.0-31-10;No--29.673-7.0-31-10
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No;No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No;No
Subject: Re: [ppsp] Request: draft-cruz-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol as WG item
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 02:45:57 -0000

Dear all,
   There is rough consensus to progress draft-cruz-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-01 to working group item in and after IETF 85. Discussion for the concerns have been
launched in the mailing list with progress.   
    Rui, please do this as soon as possible:
     - submit the draft with the new filename draft-ietf-ppsp-tracker-protocol-00  
    It is understood that there are a number of details which must be changed in the tracker protocol as WG item, which are discussing in the mailing list.
   Thank you and we are looking for your technical input to the tracker protocol。
   Merry X'mas in advance!

BR
Stefano & Yunfei

   




zhangyunfei

From: Arno Bakker
Date: 2012-12-18 15:35
To: Rui Cruz
CC: ppsp
Subject: Re: [ppsp] Request: draft-cruz-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol as WG item
Hi Rui et al

On 07/12/2012 14:39, Rui Cruz wrote:
>
>  From that, it is not logic to send an "action" request just to provide
> "status/statistic" information.
>

Then I guess we have different opinions on this. But my proposal was 
just a simplification not a missing feature, so let's leave it.


> But if the properties of peers are related with activity or
> capabilities, then I agree with you that a selection based on those
> properties would only be considered "safe" if the requesting peers are
> trusted and well known.
>
> We can add these concerns to the draft document.

Good. Please do.

Happy holidays!
      Arno


_______________________________________________
ppsp mailing list
ppsp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email