Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation
"Xiao, Lin (NSN - CN/Beijing)" <lin.xiao@nsn.com> Fri, 15 April 2011 13:26 UTC
Return-Path: <lin.xiao@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DAAE0742 for <ppsp@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.182
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.182 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.483, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_83=0.6, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uHHoaTLvjIBI for <ppsp@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7813E06D9 for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p3FDQT10007014 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:26:29 +0200
Received: from demuexc025.nsn-intra.net (demuexc025.nsn-intra.net [10.159.32.12]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p3FDQRJx015994; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:26:29 +0200
Received: from CNBEEXC007.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.192.12]) by demuexc025.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:26:26 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBFB70.B710AFB4"
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:26:23 +0800
Message-ID: <08E397856DC04A468C8283DC63E5EFDB013DAEBF@CNBEEXC007.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <201104121203222940840@chinamobile.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation
Thread-Index: Acv5rXJFOr5hI0iISp2g+kY8hk7TwgBwfGRA
References: <A983EEA5-B6A5-40B4-A400-4D4B0F2C88A1@cisco.com><201103291621340759227@chinamobile.com><E84E7B8FF3F2314DA16E48EC89AB49F005D3A297@Polydeuces.office.hd> <201104121203222940840@chinamobile.com>
From: "Xiao, Lin (NSN - CN/Beijing)" <lin.xiao@nsn.com>
To: ext zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>, Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>, ppsp@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Apr 2011 13:26:26.0947 (UTC) FILETIME=[B908ED30:01CBFB70]
Subject: Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:26:42 -0000
Hi, I think PPSP WG has the interest to study the PPSP tracker protocol,and "draft-gu-ppsp-tracker-protocol-03" is the only draft on the table, so we should accept this as WG draft. It's true that efforts are still needed to improve the quality of the draft, but more work still can be done after it's accepted as a WG draft, right? Do we have another choice? BR Lin ________________________________ From: ppsp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ppsp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext zhangyunfei Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 12:03 PM To: Martin Stiemerling; ppsp@ietf.org Subject: Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Hi all, For the transport protocol, which is beyond the current scope of PPSP, as suggested in the charter. However when we talk about the transport protocol used in practice for P2P streaming applications, UDP has been seen the most commonly used protocol now, with the transition from TCP to UDP both for data transport. And many applications(e.g., ppstream, pplive) even change from TCP to use UDP for signaling transport(draft-zhang-ppsp-protocol-comparison-measurement-00). The rational behind this is that firstly, streaming applications *don't*care much of packet loss and secondly, p2p streaming tracker and peer query mechanism ensures there are *enough* active peers to exchange data, so a peer doesn't care *much* if one request is successfully transmitted or not. This is proven in wired network. But when we consider a converged environment, we may need more investigation on whether UDP is *enough* for transport. For the encoding issue, since we polled and seems "text" is acceptable by most guys and there are some uncertainty on "binary", I would suggest (individually) to add one section to analyze the strengh and drawback of both encodings in the protocol draft. Regarding the WG item adoption, I would like to see that there is rough consensus on the questions recently raised and discussed in the mailing list before the adoption. BR Yunfei ________________________________ zhangyunfei 2011-04-12 ________________________________ 发件人: Martin Stiemerling 发送时间: 2011-04-08 22:25:40 收件人: ppsp@ietf.org 抄送: 主题: Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation [speaking as individual - not as PPSP co-chair] Hi there, Here is my incomplete review of draft-gu-ppsp-tracker-protocol-03 and my opinion of whether it is ready to become WG item: - Why are there still 2 encodings in the draft? Isn't it time to conclude on one encoding? - Section 1: "the main part is the abstract description of the operations...". This means that this is actually not a draft about the tracker protocol? - Section 1: "for both a bittorrent style offline and real-time streaming protocol". Why is it so? We are in PPSP, so we should work on something for streaming, isn't it? - Why is there the notion of battery level in the status messages? - Section 9.1.3: What is the issue with fragmentation in here? - What is the transport protocol where the tracker protocol should run over? The proposed methods look reasonable, but the overall draft organization still suffers from what Section 1 hints to that it is solely an abstract description of the operations. I'm **not** in favor of getting draft-gu-ppsp-tracker-protocol-03 to be a WG item, for these reasons: - document quality is not good enough in my opinion - it is unclear what the transport protocol is. there is a hint to UDP, which is not a good choice to be used in this particular case - there is not yet a real protocol described in the draft, but only the skeletons of two protocols (binary and HTTP). I would suggest (still speaking as individual) to first make some important decisions, e.g., encoding, fix the document, etc and **afterwards** make a new call for WG adoption. Thanks, Martin martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014 > -----Original Message----- > From: zhangyunfei [mailto:zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 10:22 AM > To: Cullen Jennings; ppsp@ietf.org > Cc: Martin Stiemerling > Subject: WG item adoption confirmation > > Hi all, > As discussed in yesterday's meeting, we will likely adopt draft-gu- > ppsp-tracker-protocol as a new WG item. Please post on the mailing list > if you have any objections on this before Apr. 10th. > If there are no objections by Apr. 10th 2011, the draft above will > be accepted as WG document fulfilling the “tracker protocol” > deliverable.Thanks. > > BR > Yunfei > > > > ________________________________ > > zhangyunfei > 2011-03-29 > ________________________________ > > 发件人: Cullen Jennings > 发送时间: 2011-03-28 17:27:23 > 收件人: ppsp@ietf.org > 抄送: > 主题: [ppsp] Notes from PPSP meeting IETF80 > > > A few notes I took from the meeting > > First, thank you to Christian Schmidt for taking minutes and > Martin Stiemerling for jabber scribing. > > We need to prioritize the use cases and decide what we will > work on first. > > draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement is getting close to WGLC > > We will likely adopt draft-gu-ppsp-tracker-protocol as a WG > item > > Were about 60 people in room > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ppsp mailing list > ppsp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp _______________________________________________ ppsp mailing list ppsp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp
- [ppsp] Notes from PPSP meeting IETF80 Cullen Jennings
- [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation zhangyunfei
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Roni Even
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Martin Stiemerling
- [ppsp] 答复: WG item adoption confirmation Ning Zong
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Ping Pan
- Re: [ppsp] 答复: WG item adoption confirmation Rahman, Akbar
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation zhangyunfei
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation li.lichun1
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Ping Pan
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Ping Pan
- Re: [ppsp] 答复: WG item adoption confirmation Yingjie Gu(yingjie)
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Yingjie Gu(yingjie)
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Yingjie Gu(yingjie)
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation li.lichun1
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation zhangyunfei
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Xiao, Lin (NSN - CN/Beijing)
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Ping Pan
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Xiao, Lin (NSN - CN/Beijing)
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Yingjie Gu(yingjie)
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Rahman, Akbar
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Yingjie Gu(yingjie)
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation David A. Bryan
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation zhangyunfei
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Rahman, Akbar
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [ppsp] WG item adoption confirmation Martin Stiemerling