IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pqc] WG adoption call for draft-hale-pquip-hybrid-signature-spectrums

Sofía Celi <cherenkov@riseup.net> Wed, 13 March 2024 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <cherenkov@riseup.net>
X-Original-To: pqc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pqc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E07EC151073 for <pqc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=riseup.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ed-uqeNTVHPc for <pqc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A5D0C14F6A5 for <pqc@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fews01-sea.riseup.net (fews01-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.109]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TvztF3H0VzDqtG for <pqc@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:43:33 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1710355413; bh=5O4kd79oxRIuNGnLldf2ug6C6T8E2GjdB/SZP9Z2xEo=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=f97a2jJ4P0qELA5PJW0hGiqEl5NsIErJc3qbbqdu121jGOc1YL6QDsPWE3YCmBiQM /QTL+ZmDWyYVn5rep5N0URKU7ZjkdRgjOotiA/SGdt6vmUlL+TKnaIvV7ur0cCfkEr 5WJwQNUC/X4LUNOC7eh5ikRNo6huh4JvbzPuxTxA=
X-Riseup-User-ID: 28F0CF0920A5BDAED82225BE7AD9E554BD2DBB94F9C844FDECB11AFFD87A43F9
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews01-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4TvztF09QKzJsFr for <pqc@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:43:32 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <f922f90a-3e74-45e9-9256-35144af941b8@riseup.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:43:29 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: pqc@ietf.org
References: <bf1ea7d9-a2e8-4e51-8ac1-8aa6bbb12a93@riseup.net> <DU0PR10MB52446C7201ADA3FBBEC7FC48E05E2@DU0PR10MB5244.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <2aa00928-2cbe-4c55-a4c3-9cc3e115e584@riseup.net> <3D868744-904F-43D2-8A82-8F16E1B070EB@nps.edu>
From: Sofía Celi <cherenkov@riseup.net>
In-Reply-To: <3D868744-904F-43D2-8A82-8F16E1B070EB@nps.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pqc/ehBqNUmAiLVjm-muyhmjv10GN0A>
Subject: Re: [Pqc] WG adoption call for draft-hale-pquip-hybrid-signature-spectrums
X-BeenThere: pqc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Post Quantum Cryptography discussion list <pqc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pqc>, <mailto:pqc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pqc/>
List-Post: <mailto:pqc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pqc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pqc>, <mailto:pqc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:44:07 -0000

Hi, Britta, and all,

Perfect! Thank you for this!

Thank you,

On 13/03/2024 12:09, Hale, Britta (CIV) wrote:
> Sofia,
> 
> Yes, that will be fine. The adoption call was (in solid IETF tradition) successful in prompting more input and discussion. We can take the highlighted points and incorporate feedback before reinitiating. This should be a fairly quick edit turnaround as it is about adding clarity to the document motivation.
> 
> Naturally, the adoption call is not the final stage and there will be opportunity for further refinement/discussion to occur thereafter. For now, I anticipate that similar level of detail about hybrid motivations as used in the TLS Hybrid KEM draft motivation would address the core points.
> 
> Britta
> 
> 
> On 3/13/24, 1:42 PM, "Pqc on behalf of Sofía Celi" <pqc-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:pqc-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of cherenkov@riseup.net <mailto:cherenkov@riseup.net>> wrote:
> 
> 
> NPS WARNING: *external sender* verify before acting.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear, all,
> 
> 
> The adoption call ended yesterday. It seems like there is no clear
> consensus on adopting the draft or not, given some voices of dissent.
> However, there seems to be a path for adoption, as stated by Stephen
> Farrell. Will the authors be interested in including this feedback?
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> --
> Sofía Celi
> @claucece
> Cryptographic research and implementation at many places, specially Brave.
> she/her, they/them.
> Chair of hprc at IRTF, pquip at IETF, and anti-fraud at W3C.
> Reach me out at: cherenkov@riseup.net <mailto:cherenkov@riseup.net>
> Website: https://sofiaceli.com/ <https://sofiaceli.com/>
> 
> 
> --
> Pqc mailing list
> Pqc@ietf.org <mailto:Pqc@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pqc <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pqc>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Sofía Celi
@claucece
Cryptographic research and implementation at many places, specially Brave.
she/her, they/them.
Chair of hprc at IRTF, pquip at IETF, and anti-fraud at W3C.
Reach me out at: cherenkov@riseup.net
Website: https://sofiaceli.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email