[precis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7700 (4570)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 23 December 2015 04:58 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98D41AC3F5 for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 20:58:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id odSyUKnA_2hk for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 20:58:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475D31AC3F2 for <precis@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 20:58:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9CED018000D; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 20:58:26 -0800 (PST)
To: peter@andyet.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, barryleiba@computer.org, Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.ca, alexey.melnikov@isode.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20151223045826.9CED018000D@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 20:58:26 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/3XGFNy-2wrq17ElE8L7knhraAIA>
Cc: precis@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [precis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7700 (4570)
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 04:58:39 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7700, "Preparation, Enforcement, and Comparison of Internationalized Strings Representing Nicknames". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7700&eid=4570 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Sam Whited <sam@samwhited.com> Section: 2.3 Original Text ------------- An entity that performs enforcement according to this profile MUST prepare a string as described in Section 2.2 and MUST also apply the following rules specified in Section 2.1 in the order shown: 1. Additional Mapping Rule 2. Normalization Rule 3. Directionality Rule After all of the foregoing rules have been enforced, the entity MUST ensure that the nickname is not zero bytes in length (this is done after enforcing the rules to prevent applications from mistakenly omitting a nickname entirely, because when internationalized characters are accepted, a non-empty sequence of characters can result in a zero-length nickname after canonicalization). Corrected Text -------------- An entity that performs enforcement according to this profile MUST prepare a string as described in Section 2.2 and MUST also apply the following rules specified in Section 2.1 in the order shown: 1. Additional Mapping Rule 2. Case Mapping Rule 3. Normalization Rule After all of the foregoing rules have been enforced, the entity MUST ensure that the nickname is not zero bytes in length (this is done after enforcing the rules to prevent applications from mistakenly omitting a nickname entirely, because when internationalized characters are accepted, a non-empty sequence of characters can result in a zero-length nickname after canonicalization). Notes ----- There is no directionality rule to be applied during enforcement as the directionality rule is part of NFKC, the case mapping rule (as mentioned in section 2.1). Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7700 (draft-ietf-precis-nickname-19) -------------------------------------- Title : Preparation, Enforcement, and Comparison of Internationalized Strings Representing Nicknames Publication Date : December 2015 Author(s) : P. Saint-Andre Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings Area : Applications and Real-Time Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [precis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7700 (457… RFC Errata System
- Re: [precis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7700 … Sam Whited
- Re: [precis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7700 … Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [precis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7700 … Peter Saint-Andre