Re: [precis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-09.txt

Sam Whited <sam@samwhited.com> Fri, 08 September 2017 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <sam@samwhited.com>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BFC13291C for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 07:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=samwhited.com header.b=pL76tS17; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=JrZvVjOH
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GGxQTfTSvO5r for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 07:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D2C8132925 for <precis@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 07:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E7520A9E; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:13:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web5 ([10.202.2.215]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 08 Sep 2017 10:13:35 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samwhited.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=OogtsBAXZ4BViEvzr yQOE+JXVN1u63vU2qao0469AcY=; b=pL76tS17o6H6kzayH8kwvRdxMhUWL/SBT LWAvJqedG52SQem9g69r+d0cwLLjjM2TbznTxxwA0j/rXbl0AhgMS7rjc05iWbbY WrBOfY6YoXQYoHURi/i/711sDb0qsYMOZfP7XzKuOhFIz051RvzaDlcYSCW9fhxf m2VGoIO2pDUYiPKBeNW2y7vjGmdeKpJ/MIrN70U4CDMmLcU59T2D+r6Zmzl/re4q 63pwq9B+9Bz23y6WDmz9ZylU2ouO8zRQYxGM8233Q2U0qruz7x6ztDTrB7YjiY3y diVxOQofj28iQRIHZNqsBKRY9hjKPypRYZYqkAFCaN5Rk2/x3V80g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=OogtsB AXZ4BViEvzryQOE+JXVN1u63vU2qao0469AcY=; b=JrZvVjOHYVxHOQzBHbpN96 npBWr66h74ojuvoUf2DomtPh8L9siFI8I+GpWpre+6uN046arbswxWSiiY8ywV7z ZOY5Su9c8Nsf1I2pCchdHsSS3zDyajiCloSieI+CXrP3znHwvQnHukjYeEjmzGc+ 9zH3BHO+B+QbHGBlnpha6GRcLbwmtpBMXt/ZUYyN/u4SEd/BOg4KjA4sPxtpgZW+ b4pb6QEu4iYO5qU9pEZAogOXExSmV6V2XIhPMI6pvklbyyay61xYAkcmCvCLk/0l Faw15blFyhTiiDGikSxphAgN5GNKVelU8mnx3qTUcmUwZsAr6XLJocD6BtGpNsGw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:j6WyWcmUlVwja4yPZP8Qs0-D3KqCCIX3lsJeRR1bnKRiswQxjG2qTg>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 707C19E2DF; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:13:35 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1504880015.1561911.1099626960.6CB0430C@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Sam Whited <sam@samwhited.com>
To: "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Cc: precis@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-973d3087
References: <150024725625.303.17137036571104960991@ietfa.amsl.com> <33f7468c-6742-7cbe-fa6f-70002c35cc62@stpeter.im> <CAHbk4RLa5AZp+sKUMoVOE2VsUmaDKGdWBqoTvurU_o=rj_OM0g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbk4RLa5AZp+sKUMoVOE2VsUmaDKGdWBqoTvurU_o=rj_OM0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 09:13:35 -0500
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/3YQKBlsBHAFVZDqgjj4lw9jZyvU>
Subject: Re: [precis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:13:37 -0000

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017, at 23:44, Sam Whited wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
> wrote:
> > What do implementers think is a "reasonable number of iterations"? My
> > sense is that we're talking about at most 4 or 5, and usually 2 or 3.

Apologies for the long delay, I know this thread is rather old now, but
I was just reminded of this blog post [1] from Spotify that shows that
the non-idempotency of the nickname profile is already a security issue
in the wild and that documenting the fact that it may have security
implications only goes so far.

—Sam

[1]: https://labs.spotify.com/2013/06/18/creative-usernames/