IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 28 March 2016 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F3912DB93 for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKeozoVRFhKh for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9456A12DB78 for <precis@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (unknown [98.245.40.52]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56626E81E0; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 15:03:57 -0600 (MDT)
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
References: <20160301221928.17792.35793.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1C1668EA-1734-4D90-82E6-3894ECB6407C@viagenie.ca> <56D61E27.40000@stpeter.im> <56F96A20.7030509@stpeter.im> <E5D59850-BE7B-4AB9-863F-E883DA9C4E13@viagenie.ca> <B85A8CBE12087A2E41BC3D35@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <56766496-6ABC-43C1-8A8E-BFF381E47333@viagenie.ca>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Message-ID: <56F99A92.9090901@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:56:50 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56766496-6ABC-43C1-8A8E-BFF381E47333@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/S8TG56ZGneYcpSsIpmckVtlpLJY>
Cc: precis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 20:56:53 -0000

On 3/28/16 2:01 PM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> On 28 Mar 2016, at 15:50, John C Klensin wrote:
>
>     --On Monday, March 28, 2016 15:28 -0400 Marc Blanchet
>     marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca <mailto:marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> wrote:
>
>             Marc, would you like me to submit these as individual I-Ds or
>             WG I-Ds? (They would be
>             draft-[ietf|saintandre]-rfc[7564|7613|7700]-bis-00.)
>
>         I'm sure that the wg is likely to be ok with wg drafts, but
>         let's do the normal process. Please submit first as
>         individual draft and we will call later for wg adoption.
>
>     Marc,
>
>     For whatever my opinion as a participant is worth, that would be
>     meaningless, time-wasting, ritual for its own sake.
>
> disagree. the step from individual to wg is the normal process and has
> no impact on technical work: the technical work can continue whatever
> the filename is. Let’s spend time on technical discussions on the
> content of the to-be-published draft.

I have no preference, but to be clear the -00 versions will be exactly 
what is in the published RFCs so that we can more easily track changes.

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email