Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG

Barry Leiba <> Sun, 03 April 2016 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6691112D56F for <>; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.4
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mo5-8IJAbt0B for <>; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:00:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF14612D556 for <>; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id l20so47120790igf.0 for <>; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 09:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=icWOMA09cg1EVZTbpOuRr6c6OoNf8IJBPQnjJdH3BKk=; b=LoHyK9gcnOLUv5tA6nDIvrzi3HvjkQxYHOaWLanRRGdEexjGvT1a592cuwx9Q495M4 l4R9zmbgePqVt3KFawOHipQX9ONymrR8zUUxfg1ohMT5N9o2JgrQy1mtteYCREzheGAw ugK5w2pUi1o+LJIH6KNGPXY5hRTLpfAJK81RfeV33gt93LKDG73NEjv0jHiaXTlJYX32 sPjYv3tIQWjdk5FKtXf7C3whuIlBUG3WVTVVJ8xZzIWGqWQtpG35RFTqMe5TsT/W40Uj vzOvMdNGxw++MQOC6Es3zU/UvsOMCJ0JyuD9ITWNhtLx2vKghJXubQvHhNFbnT9dsE9x Q6wA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=icWOMA09cg1EVZTbpOuRr6c6OoNf8IJBPQnjJdH3BKk=; b=W5ZSqgwK0Lww3lfQFiyAQjfOKVAhbHabDWRYEeg2dZ4ZOh8D2Y1bGLo9xcLL/2iLv0 t3LeNDe+SYt8Vx+Dele5W/dPr4AutMY3Y1AWcgbTKRuSa+3yMDGVbApbG4rABJiarC3s 9mfMvntkPO+OIdX/eZat0tE+CXWNyG3luMgnvYrGT+PkSVjDdk3Iz/CYKln5tV2pfud6 MZVn331N/dmSCkrYQ1uOrmJFNgW8Usn5+p9IeW3bmPwJq82Qbs9186CRFanBWoG/wH1r eayro8qQmazPmiQ8xLSoiadNh9VW1AiD500BKImrM6BVm+6k/6BijAd/fwG9p+XnfBx/ ljLA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJI4rXmgiFyHAxBqHgjppU3ZiB9hiFOwJBgYsMGTYvLfquQffHl4B4PlAC9ICurNFFVJLQ0cQgvgt7HtPQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id 93mr5286411iom.70.1459699219120; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 09:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 12:00:19 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: uEQQegsbAWv3MYqEjMIjKCp_jHA
Message-ID: <>
From: Barry Leiba <>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 16:00:21 -0000

>>>>     I'm sure that the wg is likely to be ok with wg drafts, but
>>>>     let's do the normal process. Please submit first as
>>>>     individual draft and we will call later for wg adoption.
>>>   For whatever my opinion as a participant is worth, that would be
>>>   meaningless, time-wasting, ritual for its own sake.
>> disagree. the step from individual to wg is the normal process and has
>> no impact on technical work: the technical work can continue whatever
>> the filename is. Let’s spend time on technical discussions on the
>> content of the to-be-published draft.
> I have no preference, but to be clear the -00 versions will be exactly what
> is in the published RFCs so that we can more easily track changes.

As AD for now, still, I'll say that I do have a preference, and a
rather strong one: these are updates to documents the working group
has already published.  The working group has already decided to
update them.  Please just submit them as working group documents from
the start.  Even going through motions here makes a statement that the
working group is not working on what it agreed to work on.