Re: [precis] Fwd: Milestones changed for precis WG
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 28 March 2016 17:30 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC3412DA42 for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.013
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.013 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G_8ZXwFgFF77 for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0D012DBEC for <precis@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (unknown [98.245.40.52]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22BB9E81E0; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 11:37:15 -0600 (MDT)
To: precis@ietf.org
References: <20160301221928.17792.35793.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1C1668EA-1734-4D90-82E6-3894ECB6407C@viagenie.ca> <56D61E27.40000@stpeter.im>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Message-ID: <56F96A20.7030509@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 11:30:08 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56D61E27.40000@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/delxy2BQV2coHg9LCiuNnGjdKtY>
Subject: Re: [precis] Fwd: Milestones changed for precis WG
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:30:11 -0000
On 3/1/16 3:56 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 3/1/16 3:23 PM, Marc Blanchet wrote: >> hello, >> we were thinking of closing the working group since the main topics >> have been done and published as RFC. However, as some mailing list >> discussions require that some corrections to RFC 7564 and 7613 are >> needed, we added those two milestones to the charter. The intent is when >> those are done, we would close the working group. > > Thanks, Marc. Here is my understanding of what needs to be done: > > In RFC 7564: > > 1. Change §5.2.3 to mention Unicode toLower() as an alternative to > Unicode Default Case Folding and describe the circumstances in which > toLower() is appropriate. > > 2. Change the order of operations in §7 from MUST to SHOULD (we've > already deviated from that slightly in RFC 7613 §3.2.1). > > 3. Clarify the meaning of 'preparation' (because it is different from > what stringprep meant by the term). > > In RFC 7613: > > a. Revisit Unicode Default Case Folding here, too. > > b. Modify the *presentation* (but not the content) of the rules for each > profile, along the lines of what we did in RFC 7700 (i.e., describe the > rules in one section and then use them in separate sections on > preparation, enforcement, and comparison). > > We'll also want to review and correct the errata that have been reported. > > I can commit to doing this work. FYI, I plan to submit -00 versions of the bis documents when the submission window opens again on April 3. Marc, would you like me to submit these as individual I-Ds or WG I-Ds? (They would be draft-[ietf|saintandre]-rfc[7564|7613|7700]-bis-00.) Peter
- [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG IETF Secretariat
- [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG IETF Secretariat
- [precis] Fwd: Milestones changed for precis WG Marc Blanchet
- Re: [precis] Fwd: Milestones changed for precis WG Peter Saint-Andre
- [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG IETF Secretariat
- [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG IETF Secretariat
- [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG IETF Secretariat
- Re: [precis] Fwd: Milestones changed for precis WG Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG Marc Blanchet
- Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG John C Klensin
- Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG Christian Schudt
- Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG Marc Blanchet
- Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG Barry Leiba
- Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG Marc Blanchet
- Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG John C Klensin
- Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG Marc Blanchet
- [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG IETF Secretariat
- [precis] order of operations (was: Re: Milestones… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [precis] order of operations (was: Re: Milest… Sam Whited
- Re: [precis] order of operations Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [precis] order of operations Sam Whited
- Re: [precis] order of operations Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [precis] order of operations Martin J. Dürst