Re: [Privacy-pass] Working group last Call for batched Tokens

Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com> Wed, 20 March 2024 05:23 UTC

Return-Path: <svaldez@google.com>
X-Original-To: privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73DEC1D61E6 for <privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mA6wXC4CTmO2 for <privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-x1136.google.com (mail-yw1-x1136.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1136]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47C11C1D5C7D for <privacy-pass@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-x1136.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-609fc742044so69033867b3.1 for <privacy-pass@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1710912214; x=1711517014; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=M8aZNtzUWn2Ej2HhyiKowpeK1OKBi96lgjn9EqhyY4E=; b=HSmtWpjQzQpR/tOczQXX4neo9k7z9Imp8X1o/7pWpXZ+vPaE9nbX2aCsR7mg60NMGD TCzEKO3LyDEu68FvmXEw6zZWCl8f4E57sf7rwfWtU3faY+vAsm6jWu8FGgIOuxmDpqxb QgFjqsiy77nLQrSDGy/gGp3qmS9BIokL+Tbgqy42foT9xp8JCQRP+AWFJVEH4VcAIzHm jqVRODLZ+8wsHtKJ0HVG0dQD9fqHIVL5sjK/lCydE8lGBTo7avFBEfe5zB+1M7DitDDr d9Y/ML+hYVEZ5M7ckfjmAEpJul6DDClY0tmwXCqpS5QLpQ66DM10ejBIpoxG7YUXXqmM 8fFA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710912214; x=1711517014; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=M8aZNtzUWn2Ej2HhyiKowpeK1OKBi96lgjn9EqhyY4E=; b=VGqqae2W1y5ItIXd/XTJGcV+Q1CS/pLQhL+dRNbLdCiTexXRQNuLn5Vpgdn/9c3y99 YtY+yJy7jbp3WsOzUiMBdcWja+9u/ZBhiduPdCeqB7IQ4f8BlpdMSJ5lD79K76sufD2t 96FigQ1oS8X5URaEabm1YFCVQRIAMzuwUJYsdb7xah1cqKG9MLGU4FDgDGlbecVsXlgz 4y1H3uDYeTJapyLXB3ej1YUVrOcg8Q71Xnkjp6lVTFI6rax85nUeXQYBrx/iALSBuBNn zsR9Xe0ZxMw7C/UnRDgVot/KIQ7p0QiyT7OEJ8ragE5bTLw0Ases6COsP3XLRtC0eArG K8Cw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy+uL7EqscNpLSMlLTlQVRDmG0k0jY52F9PbCtK0AyqnpE7Rc7m fTZGArNQ/xs89cnn1srsboHtlBTuVwz5sOP4EuNEIq0gB1SNTyxr204mlI8+cjKWjt9ZC4IpYrl RIpwRo547TQNnB30jkS6J7eUVV4iusCZ/eq69wT0RUj5wXqCy6mBz
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH/7Rd3oOkNvSMBJNXa6k8La+MSw/WJhKaShmAZL4dNQbcNjMAga0uK+VDer1fYIwSl6Y218qn11y1czfdqVDE=
X-Received: by 2002:a81:4cc9:0:b0:610:f5db:697f with SMTP id z192-20020a814cc9000000b00610f5db697fmr721787ywa.11.1710912213864; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOgPGoDiW2XgOGkv_ug=TFP=BNJG=SffJVcE8zCnv4cXvudYsw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOgPGoDiW2XgOGkv_ug=TFP=BNJG=SffJVcE8zCnv4cXvudYsw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:23:20 +1000
Message-ID: <CANduzxAPCDhvqV3jOYXiYywLok4g+i5KZw=p=fnszKwuGEw4bw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
Cc: privacy-pass@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c053d9061410ca94"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/privacy-pass/19l2zcGA9xThakEtQl_rYEZFZmw>
Subject: Re: [Privacy-pass] Working group last Call for batched Tokens
X-BeenThere: privacy-pass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Pass Protocol <privacy-pass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/privacy-pass>, <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/privacy-pass/>
List-Post: <mailto:privacy-pass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy-pass>, <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:23:42 -0000

I think this draft looks mostly good and I support it going to the IESG.
There is one outstanding issue #6
<https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/ietf-draft-privacypass-batched-tokens/issues/6>
(I submitted and forgot to follow up on) regarding adding the VOPRF variant
as a defined type since we're relying on that variant for PST. I can try to
get a PR for that submitted, though not sure what the ordering between the
draft being expired, the WGLC and cutting a new draft should look like?

-Steven

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 2:47 PM Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> wrote:

> This is the working group last call for Batched Token Issuance Protocol (
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-privacypass-batched-tokens/).
> Please review the document and indicate if it is ready to forward to the
> IESG by posting comments to this thread.  The internet draft is about to
> expire but should still be accessible.  Please send your comments by March
> 26, 2024.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe and Ben
> --
> Privacy-pass mailing list
> Privacy-pass@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy-pass
>


-- 

 Steven Valdez |  Chrome Privacy Sandbox |  svaldez@google.com |  Cambridge,
MA